Suppr超能文献

利那洛肽治疗儿科患者功能性便秘的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心3期试验。

Efficacy and safety of linaclotide in treating functional constipation in paediatric patients: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

作者信息

Di Lorenzo Carlo, Khlevner Julie, Rodriguez-Araujo Gerardo, Xie Wangang, Huh Susanna Y, Ando Masakazu, Hyams Jeffrey S, Nurko Samuel, Benninga Marc A, Simon Michael, Hewson Marcella E, Saps Miguel

机构信息

Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar;9(3):238-250. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00398-9. Epub 2024 Jan 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase C agonist, has been approved in the USA for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation and irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation in adults. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of linaclotide in paediatric patients aged 6-17 years with functional constipation.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study was done at 64 clinic or hospital sites in seven countries (USA, Canada, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Ukraine, and Estonia). Patients aged 6-17 years who met modified Rome III criteria for functional constipation were randomly assigned (1:1), with a block size of four and stratified by age (6-11 years and 12-17 years), to receive either oral linaclotide 72 μg or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Participants, investigators, and data assessors were masked to assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) in the 12-week frequency rate of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs; occurring in the absence of rescue medication on the calendar day of or before the bowel movement) per week and the secondary efficacy endpoint was CFB in stool consistency over the 12-week treatment period; efficacy and safety were analysed in all patients in the randomised population who received at least one dose of study intervention (modified intention-to-treat population and safety population, respectively). The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04026113, and the functional constipation part of the study is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 1, 2019, and March 21, 2022, 330 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to linaclotide (n=166) or placebo (n=164). Two patients in the linaclotide group did not receive any treatment; thus, efficacy and safety endpoints were assessed in 328 patients (164 patients in each group). 293 (89%) patients completed the 12-week treatment period (148 in the linaclotide group and 145 in the placebo group). 181 (55%) of 328 patients were female and 147 (45%) were male. At baseline, the mean frequency rate for SBMs was 1·28 SBMs per week (SD 0·87) for placebo and 1·16 SBMs per week (0·83) for linaclotide, increasing to 2·29 SBMs per week (1·99) for placebo and 3·41 SBMs per week (2·76) for linaclotide during intervention. Compared with placebo (least-squares mean [LSM] CFB 1·05 SBMs per week [SE 0·19]), patients treated with linaclotide showed significant improvement in SBM frequency (LSM CFB 2·22 SBMs per week [0·19]; LSM CFB difference 1·17 SBMs per week [95% CI 0·65-1·69]; p<0·0001). Linaclotide also significantly improved stool consistency over placebo (LSM CFB 1·11 [SE 0·08] vs 0·69 [0·08]; LSM CFB difference 0·42 [95% CI 0·21-0·64]; p=0·0001). The most reported treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) by patients treated with linaclotide was diarrhoea (seven [4%] of 164 vs three [2%] of 164 patients in the placebo group) and by patients treated with placebo was COVID-19 (five [3%] vs four [2%] in the linaclotide group). The most frequent treatment-related TEAE was diarrhoea (linaclotide: six [4%] patients; placebo: two [1%] patients). One serious adverse event of special interest (treatment-related severe diarrhoea resulting in dehydration and hospitalisation) occurred in a female patient aged 17 years in the linaclotide group; this case resolved without sequelae after administration of intravenous fluids. No deaths occurred during the study.

INTERPRETATION

Linaclotide is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment for functional constipation in paediatric patients and has subsequently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication.

FUNDING

AbbVie and Ironwood Pharmaceuticals.

摘要

背景

利那洛肽是一种鸟苷酸环化酶C激动剂,已在美国获批用于治疗成人慢性特发性便秘和以便秘为主型的肠易激综合征。我们旨在评估利那洛肽治疗6至17岁功能性便秘儿科患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心3期研究在七个国家(美国、加拿大、以色列、意大利、荷兰、乌克兰和爱沙尼亚)的64个诊所或医院进行。符合功能性便秘改良罗马III标准的6至17岁患者被随机分配(1:1),分组块大小为4,并按年龄(6至11岁和12至17岁)分层,接受每日一次口服72μg利那洛肽或安慰剂,共12周。参与者、研究者和数据评估者均对分组情况不知情。主要疗效终点是12周内每周自发排便次数(SBMs;在排便当日或之前未使用急救药物的情况下发生)相对于基线的变化(CFB),次要疗效终点是12周治疗期内粪便稠度的CFB;在随机分组人群中接受至少一剂研究干预的所有患者中分析疗效和安全性(分别为改良意向性治疗人群和安全性人群)。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT04026113,且该研究的功能性便秘部分已完成。

结果

在2019年10月1日至2022年3月21日期间,330例患者入组并随机分配至利那洛肽组(n = 166)或安慰剂组(n = 164)。利那洛肽组有2例患者未接受任何治疗;因此,在328例患者(每组164例)中评估疗效和安全性终点。293例(89%)患者完成了12周治疗期(利那洛肽组148例,安慰剂组145例)。328例患者中181例(55%)为女性,147例(45%)为男性。基线时,安慰剂组SBMs的平均频率为每周1.28次(标准差0.87),利那洛肽组为每周1.16次(0.83),干预期间安慰剂组增加至每周2.29次(1.99),利那洛肽组增加至每周3.41次(2.76)。与安慰剂组(最小二乘均值[LSM]CFB为每周1.05次SBMs[标准误0.19])相比,接受利那洛肽治疗的患者SBM频率有显著改善(LSM CFB为每周2.22次SBMs[0.19];LSM CFB差异为每周1.17次SBMs[95%置信区间CI 0.65 - 1.69];p < 0.0001)。与安慰剂相比,利那洛肽在改善粪便稠度方面也有显著效果(LSM CFB为1.11[标准误0.08]对0.69[0.08];LSM CFB差异为0.42[95%CI 0.21 - 0.64];p = 0.0001)。接受利那洛肽治疗的患者报告最多的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)是腹泻(164例中有7例[4%],而安慰剂组164例中有3例[2%]),接受安慰剂治疗的患者报告最多的是新冠病毒感染(5例[3%]对利那洛肽组的4例[2%])。最常见的与治疗相关的TEAE是腹泻(利那洛肽组:6例[4%]患者;安慰剂组:2例[1%]患者)。利那洛肽组一名17岁女性患者发生了一例特别关注的严重不良事件(与治疗相关的严重腹泻导致脱水和住院);该病例在静脉补液后痊愈,无后遗症。研究期间无死亡病例。

解读

利那洛肽是治疗儿科患者功能性便秘的一种有效且耐受性良好的药物,随后已被美国食品药品监督管理局批准用于该适应症。

资助

艾伯维和铁木制药公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验