Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Strada le Grazie, 8, Verona 37134, Italy.
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; School of Psychology, Keele University, United Kingdom.
Neuroimage. 2024 Feb 1;286:120514. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120514. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
Visual attention can be guided by statistical regularities in the environment, that people implicitly learn from past experiences (statistical learning, SL). Moreover, a perceptually salient element can automatically capture attention, gaining processing priority through a bottom-up attentional control mechanism. The aim of our study was to investigate the dynamics of SL and if it shapes attentional target selection additively with salience processing, or whether these mechanisms interact, e.g. one gates the other. In a visual search task, we therefore manipulated target frequency (high vs. low) across locations while, in some trials, the target was salient in terms of colour. Additionally, halfway through the experiment, the high-frequency location changed to the opposite hemifield. EEG activity was simultaneously recorded, with a specific interest in two markers related to target selection and post-selection processing, respectively: N2pc and SPCN. Our results revealed that both SL and saliency significantly enhanced behavioural performance, but also interacted with each other, with an attenuated saliency effect at the high-frequency target location, and a smaller SL effect for salient targets. Concerning processing dynamics, the benefit of salience processing was more evident during the early stage of target selection and processing, as indexed by a larger N2pc and early-SPCN, whereas SL modulated the underlying neural activity particularly later on, as revealed by larger late-SPCN. Furthermore, we showed that SL was rapidly acquired and adjusted when the spatial imbalance changed. Overall, our findings suggest that SL is flexible to changes and, combined with salience processing, jointly contributes to establishing attentional priority.
视觉注意力可以通过环境中的统计规律来引导,而人们可以从过去的经验中(统计学习,SL)隐含地学习这些规律。此外,一个知觉上显著的元素可以通过自下而上的注意力控制机制自动吸引注意力,获得处理优先级。我们的研究目的是调查 SL 的动态,以及它是否与显著性处理叠加地塑造注意力目标选择,或者这些机制是否相互作用,例如一个机制会阻止另一个机制。因此,在一个视觉搜索任务中,我们在位置上操纵目标频率(高 vs. 低),而在某些试验中,目标在颜色方面是显著的。此外,在实验中途,高频位置变为对侧半视野。同时记录 EEG 活动,特别关注与目标选择和后选择处理分别相关的两个标记:N2pc 和 SPCN。我们的结果表明,SL 和显著性都显著提高了行为表现,但它们也相互作用,在高频目标位置上显著性效应减弱,显著目标的 SL 效应较小。关于处理动态,显著性处理的益处在目标选择和处理的早期阶段更为明显,表现为更大的 N2pc 和早期 SPCN,而 SL 则在后期调制了潜在的神经活动,表现为更大的晚期 SPCN。此外,我们表明,当空间不平衡发生变化时,SL 可以快速获得和调整。总的来说,我们的发现表明,SL 是灵活的,可以适应变化,并与显著性处理相结合,共同有助于建立注意力优先级。