Suppr超能文献

焦虑障碍心理治疗后正性负性情绪变化的系统评价和Meta 分析。

Positive and negative affect change following psychotherapeutic treatment for anxiety-related disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, 6363 Alvarado Court, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92120, USA.

University of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, 9452 Medical Center Drive, 4E-226, La Jolla, CA 921037, USA.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2024 Mar 15;349:358-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.086. Epub 2024 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anxiety-related disorders feature elevated negative affect (NA), and in some cases, diminished positive affect (PA). It remains unclear how well extant psychotherapies for anxiety-related disorders improve PA versus NA.

METHODS

We systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, PsychInfo, and Web of Science databases. Records included studies involving (1) patients with a principal or co-principal diagnosis of at least one anxiety-related disorder (i.e., generalized anxiety, social anxiety, panic, agoraphobia, health anxiety, specific phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or posttraumatic stress disorder), and (2) pre- and post-treatment PA and NA scores or a change index between pre- and post-treatment PA and NA scores. Effect sizes were calculated for meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with 1001 adults with an anxiety-related disorder were included. Psychotherapeutic interventions included cognitive behavioral, present-centered, and imagery-based approaches. Treatments reduced NA (g = -0.90; 95%CI [-1.19, -0.61]) to a greater extent than they improved PA (g = 0.27; 95%CI [0.05, 0.59]), Z = -5.26, p < .001. The limited number of studies available precluded analyses of the relationship between changes in affect and symptoms.

LIMITATIONS

Results should be considered with caution given the small number and heterogeneity of included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Current psychotherapeutic interventions for anxiety-related disorders may not improve PA and NA to comparable levels.

摘要

背景

焦虑相关障碍的特点是负性情绪(NA)升高,在某些情况下,正性情绪(PA)降低。目前尚不清楚现有的焦虑相关障碍心理治疗方法在改善 PA 和 NA 方面的效果如何。

方法

我们系统地检索了 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、PubMed、PsychInfo 和 Web of Science 数据库。纳入的研究包括:(1)至少有一个主要或共同主要诊断为焦虑相关障碍(即广泛性焦虑、社交焦虑、惊恐障碍、广场恐怖症、健康焦虑、特定恐惧症、强迫症或创伤后应激障碍)的患者;(2)治疗前后的 PA 和 NA 评分或治疗前后 PA 和 NA 评分之间的变化指数。对荟萃分析进行效应量计算。

结果

纳入了 14 项研究,共 1001 名患有焦虑相关障碍的成年人。心理治疗干预包括认知行为、当下中心和意象为基础的方法。治疗方法降低了 NA(g=-0.90;95%CI [-1.19,-0.61])的程度,比提高 PA(g=0.27;95%CI [0.05,0.59])的程度更大,Z=-5.26,p<0.001。由于纳入研究的数量有限,无法分析情感变化与症状之间的关系。

局限性

考虑到纳入研究的数量较少且存在异质性,结果应谨慎解读。

结论

目前用于治疗焦虑相关障碍的心理治疗方法可能无法将 PA 和 NA 改善到相当的水平。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验