• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腕部佩戴式加速度计:数据收集与处理过程中决策的影响:一项横断面研究。

Wrist-worn accelerometers: Influence of decisions during data collection and processing: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Eke Helén, Bonn Stephanie E, Trolle Lagerros Ylva

机构信息

Department of Medicine (Solna) Clinical Epidemiology Division, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.

Center for Obesity, Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm Health Services Stockholm Sweden.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 10;7(1):e1810. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1810. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.1810
PMID:38213780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10782047/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Accelerometers collect data in an objective way, however, a number of decisions must be done during data collection, processing and output-interpretation. The influence of those decisions is seldom investigated, reported, or discussed. Herein, we examined the influence of different decisions on the outcomes: daily minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), inactivity and light physical activity (LPA).

METHODS

In total, 156 participants wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph wGT3X-BT) on their nondominant wrist for 7 days. Data collection was conducted from February 2017 to June 2018. Data was processed using the R-package GGIR and default settings were compared to by-the-literature-suggested options. The output was examined using paired -tests.

RESULTS

When comparing two commonly used MVPA-cut-points, default and Hildebrand et al. we found a marginal difference (0.4 min, 1.0%,  < 0.001) in MVPA/day. When no bout criteria for MVPA/day was applied, MVPA/day was twice as high as bouted MVPA/day. Further, when we changed the epoch-length from 5 to 1 s, statistically significant changes were seen for MVPA/day (-6.6 min, 19%,  < 0.001), inactivity/day (-22 min, 3.0%, < 0.001) and LPA/day (28 min, 81%,  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Decisions made during data processing of wrist-worn accelerometers has an influence on the output and thus, may influence the conclusions drawn. However, there may be situations when these settings are changed. If so, we recommend examining if the variables of interest are affected. We encourage researchers to report decisions made during data collection, processing and output-interpretation, to facilitate comparisons between different studies.

摘要

背景与目的

加速度计以客观的方式收集数据,然而,在数据收集、处理和输出解释过程中必须做出许多决策。这些决策的影响很少被研究、报道或讨论。在此,我们研究了不同决策对结果的影响:中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)、不活动和轻度身体活动(LPA)的每日分钟数。

方法

共有156名参与者在其非优势手腕上佩戴加速度计(ActiGraph wGT3X - BT)7天。数据收集于2017年2月至2018年6月进行。使用R包GGIR处理数据,并将默认设置与文献建议的选项进行比较。使用配对检验检查输出结果。

结果

比较两个常用的MVPA切点(默认值和希尔德布兰德等人提出的值)时,我们发现MVPA/天存在微小差异(0.4分钟,1.0%,<0.001)。当不应用MVPA/天的发作标准时,MVPA/天是有发作标准的MVPA/天的两倍。此外,当我们将时间间隔从5秒改为1秒时,MVPA/天(-6.6分钟,19%,<0.001)、不活动/天(-22分钟,3.0%,<0.001)和LPA/天(28分钟,81%,<0.001)出现了统计学上的显著变化。

结论

手腕佩戴式加速度计数据处理过程中做出的决策会影响输出结果,因此可能会影响得出的结论。然而,在某些情况下可能会更改这些设置。如果是这样,我们建议检查感兴趣的变量是否受到影响。我们鼓励研究人员报告在数据收集、处理和输出解释过程中做出的决策,以便于不同研究之间的比较。

相似文献

1
Wrist-worn accelerometers: Influence of decisions during data collection and processing: A cross-sectional study.腕部佩戴式加速度计:数据收集与处理过程中决策的影响:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 10;7(1):e1810. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1810. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Raw Accelerometer Data Analysis with GGIR R-package: Does Accelerometer Brand Matter?使用 GGIR R 包分析原始加速度计数据:加速度计品牌重要吗?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Oct;48(10):1935-41. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000978.
3
Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers.使用腕部和髋部佩戴的加速度计评估儿童的身体活动。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Dec;46(12):2308-16. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000365.
4
Accelerometer-measured physical activity in mid-age Australian adults.澳大利亚中年成年人的加速度计测量的身体活动。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 21;22(1):1952. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14333-z.
5
Twenty four-hour activity cycle in older adults using wrist-worn accelerometers: The seniors-ENRICA-2 study.老年人使用腕戴式加速度计的 24 小时活动周期:Seniors-ENRICA-2 研究。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 Apr;30(4):700-708. doi: 10.1111/sms.13612. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
6
Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.在自由生活环境中评估身体活动和久坐行为:基于消费者的活动追踪器与ActiGraph加速度计的实用比较
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 7;18(9):e239. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5531.
7
Surveillance of Youth Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior With Wrist Accelerometry.利用腕部加速度计监测青少年身体活动和久坐行为
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):872-879. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.012.
8
Combined influence of epoch length, cut-point and bout duration on accelerometry-derived physical activity.时程长度、切点和活动持续时间对加速度计测量的身体活动的综合影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Mar 10;11(1):34. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-34.
9
Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.从佩戴在腕部的 ActiGraph 加速度计在自由生活的成年人中确定活动强度的切点的开发。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Nov;38(22):2569-2578. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1794244. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
10
Wrist-specific accelerometry methods for estimating free-living physical activity.腕部加速度计法估算自由活动体力活动。
J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Jun;22(6):677-683. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical Activity Perceptions and Participation of People With Type II Diabetes Mellitus in the Dominican Republic.多米尼加共和国II型糖尿病患者的身体活动认知与参与情况
Cureus. 2024 Jun 18;16(6):e62608. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62608. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Concurrent Validity of Four Activity Monitors in Older Adults.四种活动监测器在老年人中的同时效度。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;24(3):895. doi: 10.3390/s24030895.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.从佩戴在腕部的 ActiGraph 加速度计在自由生活的成年人中确定活动强度的切点的开发。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Nov;38(22):2569-2578. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1794244. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
2
Challenges and opportunities related to the objective assessment of physical activity within U.S. health surveys.美国健康调查中与体力活动客观评估相关的挑战和机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;43:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
3
Comparability of accelerometer signal aggregation metrics across placements and dominant wrist cut points for the assessment of physical activity in adults.
在评估成年人的身体活动时,加速度计信号聚合指标在不同位置和主要手腕切割点的可比性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54267-y.
4
A comparison of physical activity from Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers worn on the dominant and non-dominant wrist.对佩戴在优势手腕和非优势手腕上的Actigraph GT3X+加速度计所记录的身体活动进行比较。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2019 Jan;39(1):51-56. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12538. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
5
App-technology to increase physical activity among patients with diabetes type 2 - the DiaCert-study, a randomized controlled trial.应用技术提高 2 型糖尿病患者的身体活动水平 - DiaCert 研究,一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5026-4.
6
Accelerometer assessed moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and successful ageing: results from the Whitehall II study.加速度计评估中等至剧烈体力活动与成功老龄化:来自白厅 II 研究的结果。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 3;8:45772. doi: 10.1038/srep45772.
7
Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations.加速度计数据采集和处理标准评估体力活动和其他结果:系统评价和实际考虑。
Sports Med. 2017 Sep;47(9):1821-1845. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0.
8
Reporting accelerometer methods in physical activity intervention studies: a systematic review and recommendations for authors.报告在体力活动干预研究中使用加速度计的方法:系统评价及对作者的建议。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;52(23):1507-1516. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095947. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
9
Sampling frequency affects the processing of Actigraph raw acceleration data to activity counts.采样频率会影响将Actigraph原始加速度数据处理为活动计数的过程。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Feb 1;120(3):362-9. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00628.2015. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
10
Reliability of Objectively Measured Sedentary Time and Physical Activity in Adults.成人久坐时间和身体活动客观测量的可靠性
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 20;10(7):e0133296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133296. eCollection 2015.