Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
John Stearne Medical Library, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Acta Paediatr. 2024 Mar;113(3):394-402. doi: 10.1111/apa.17093. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a respiratory complication associated with neonatal prematurity, presents opportunities for pharmacological intervention due to its contributing risk factors. Despite diuretics' controversial usage in BPD treatment and varying institutional practices, this review aims to consolidate evidence from clinical trials regarding diuretic use in BPD.
We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and CINAHL databases (PROSPERO 2022: CRD42022328292). Covidence facilitated screening and data extraction, followed by analysis and formatting in Microsoft Excel.
Among 430 screened records, 13 were included for analysis. Three studies assessed spironolactone and chlorothiazide combinations, two studied spironolactone and hydrochlorothiazide, while eight examined furosemide. All studies evaluated drug effects on dynamic pulmonary compliance and pulmonary resistance, serving as comparative measures in our review.
Diuretics' effectiveness in treating bronchopulmonary dysplasia remains uncertain. The limited number of identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) hampers high-level evidence-based conclusions when applying the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) approach. Conducting large prospective studies of good quality could provide more definitive insights, but the rarity of outcomes and eligible patients poses challenges. Further research, primarily focusing on RCTs assessing diuretics' safety and efficacy in this population, is warranted.
支气管肺发育不良(BPD)是一种与新生儿早产相关的呼吸系统并发症,由于其相关的危险因素,为药物干预提供了机会。尽管利尿剂在 BPD 治疗中的使用存在争议,且各机构的实践做法也存在差异,但本综述旨在汇总关于 BPD 中利尿剂使用的临床试验证据。
我们按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统综述,检索了 EMBASE、Medline、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 数据库(PROSPERO 2022:CRD42022328292)。Covidence 协助进行了筛选和数据提取,随后在 Microsoft Excel 中进行了分析和格式化。
在筛选出的 430 条记录中,有 13 条被纳入分析。三项研究评估了螺内酯和氯噻嗪的联合用药,两项研究研究了螺内酯和氢氯噻嗪,八项研究则评估了呋塞米。所有研究都评估了药物对动态肺顺应性和肺阻力的影响,作为我们综述中的比较指标。
利尿剂治疗支气管肺发育不良的效果仍不确定。由于确定的随机对照试验(RCT)数量有限,当应用人群、干预、比较、结局(PICO)方法时,难以得出基于高证据水平的结论。开展高质量的大型前瞻性研究可能会提供更明确的见解,但结局和合格患者的罕见性带来了挑战。需要进一步研究,主要集中在评估利尿剂在该人群中安全性和疗效的 RCT 上。