Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Neonatology, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 13;3(3):CD010941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010941.pub3.
Systematic reviews showed that systemic postnatal corticosteroids reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants. However, corticosteroids have also been associated with an increased risk of neurodevelopmental impairment. It is unknown whether these beneficial and adverse effects are modulated by differences in corticosteroid treatment regimens related to type of steroid, timing of treatment initiation, duration, pulse versus continuous delivery, and cumulative dose.
To assess the effects of different corticosteroid treatment regimens on mortality, pulmonary morbidity, and neurodevelopmental outcome in very low birth weight infants.
We conducted searches in September 2022 of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and two trial registries, without date, language or publication- type limits. Other search methods included checking the reference lists of included studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized trials.
We included RCTs comparing two or more different treatment regimens of systemic postnatal corticosteroids in preterm infants at risk for BPD, as defined by the original trialists. The following comparisons of intervention were eligible: alternative corticosteroid (e.g. hydrocortisone) versus another corticosteroid (e.g. dexamethasone); lower (experimental arm) versus higher dosage (control arm); later (experimental arm) versus earlier (control arm) initiation of therapy; a pulse-dosage (experimental arm) versus continuous-dosage regimen (control arm); and individually-tailored regimens (experimental arm) based on the pulmonary response versus a standardized (predetermined administered to every infant) regimen (control arm). We excluded placebo-controlled and inhalation corticosteroid studies.
Two authors independently assessed eligibility and risk of bias of trials, and extracted data on study design, participant characteristics and the relevant outcomes. We asked the original investigators to verify if data extraction was correct and, if possible, to provide any missing data. We assessed the following primary outcome: the composite outcome mortality or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA). Secondary outcomes were: the components of the composite outcome; in-hospital morbidities and pulmonary outcomes, and long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae. We analyzed data using Review Manager 5 and used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.
We included 16 studies in this review; of these, 15 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Two trials investigated multiple regimens, and were therefore included in more than one comparison. Only RCTs investigating dexamethasone were identified. Eight studies enrolling a total of 306 participants investigated the cumulative dosage administered; these trials were categorized according to the cumulative dosage investigated, 'low' being < 2 mg/kg, 'moderate' being between 2 and 4 mg/kg, and 'high' > 4 mg/kg; three studies contrasted a high versus a moderate cumulative dose, and five studies a moderate versus a low cumulative dexamethasone dose. We graded the certainty of the evidence low to very low because of the small number of events, and the risk of selection, attrition and reporting bias. Overall analysis of the studies investigating a higher dose versus a lower dosage regimen showed no differences in the outcomes BPD, the composite outcome death or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA, or abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome in survivors assessed. Although there was no evidence of a subgroup difference for the higher versus lower dosage regimens comparisons (Chi = 2.91, df = 1 (P = 0.09), I = 65.7%), a larger effect was seen in the subgroup analysis of moderate-dosage regimens versus high-dosage regimens for the outcome cerebral palsy in survivors. In this subgroup analysis, there was an increased risk of cerebral palsy (RR 6.85, 95% CI 1.29 to 36.36; RD 0.23, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.37; P = 0.02; I² = 0%; NNTH 5, 95% CI 2.6 to 12.7; 2 studies, 74 infants). There was evidence of subgroup differences for higher versus lower dosage regimens comparisons for the combined outcomes death or cerebral palsy, and death and abnormal neurodevelopmental outcomes (Chi = 4.25, df = 1 (P = 0.04), I = 76.5%; and Chi = 7.11, df = 1 (P = 0.008), I = 85.9%, respectively). In the subgroup analysis comparing a high dosage regimen of dexamethasone versus a moderate cumulative-dosage regimen, there was an increased risk of death or cerebral palsy (RR 3.20, 95% CI 1.35 to 7.58; RD 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.41; P = 0.002; I² = 0%; NNTH 5, 95% CI 2.4 to 13.6; 2 studies, 84 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), and death or abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome (RR 3.41, 95% CI 1.44 to 8.07; RD 0.28, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.44; P = 0.0009; I² = 0%; NNTH 4, 95% CI 2.2 to 10.4; 2 studies, 84 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no differences in outcomes between a moderate- and a low-dosage regimen. Five studies enrolling 797 infants investigated early initiation of dexamethasone therapy versus a moderately early or delayed initiation, and showed no significant differences in the overall analyses for the primary outcomes. The two RCTs investigating a continuous versus a pulse dexamethasone regimen showed an increased risk of the combined outcome death or BPD when using the pulse therapy. Finally, three trials investigating a standard regimen versus a participant-individualized course of dexamethasone showed no difference in the primary outcome and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. We assessed the GRADE certainty of evidence for all comparisons discussed above as moderate to very low, because the validity of all comparisons is hampered by unclear or high risk of bias, small samples of randomized infants, heterogeneity in study population and design, non-protocolized use of 'rescue' corticosteroids and lack of long-term neurodevelopmental data in most studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence is very uncertain about the effects of different corticosteroid regimens on the outcomes mortality, pulmonary morbidity, and long term neurodevelopmental impairment. Despite the fact that the studies investigating higher versus lower dosage regimens showed that higher-dosage regimens may reduce the incidence of death or neurodevelopmental impairment, we cannot conclude what the optimal type, dosage, or timing of initiation is for the prevention of BPD in preterm infants, based on current level of evidence. Further high quality trials would be needed to establish the optimal systemic postnatal corticosteroid dosage regimen.
系统评价显示,全身应用皮质类固醇可降低早产儿支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的风险。然而,皮质类固醇也与神经发育损伤风险增加有关。目前尚不清楚这些有益和不良影响是否与皮质类固醇治疗方案的差异有关,如类固醇类型、治疗开始时机、持续时间、脉冲与持续给药、累积剂量。
评估不同皮质类固醇治疗方案对极低出生体重儿死亡率、肺部发病率和神经发育结局的影响。
我们于 2022 年 9 月在 MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和两个试验注册库中进行了检索,未设置日期、语言或出版物类型限制。其他检索方法包括检查纳入研究的随机对照试验(RCT)和准随机试验的参考文献,以查找随机对照试验。
我们纳入了比较早产儿 BPD 风险(由原始试验确定)的两种或多种不同全身皮质类固醇治疗方案的 RCT。符合条件的干预措施比较包括:替代皮质类固醇(如氢可酮)与另一种皮质类固醇(如地塞米松);低剂量(实验组)与高剂量(对照组);治疗开始时晚(实验组)与早(对照组);脉冲剂量(实验组)与持续剂量方案(对照组);以及基于肺反应的个体化方案(实验组)与标准化(预定给予每个婴儿)方案(对照组)。我们排除了安慰剂对照和吸入皮质类固醇研究。
两位作者独立评估了试验的入选标准和偏倚风险,并提取了研究设计、参与者特征和相关结局的数据。我们请原始研究者核实数据提取是否正确,如果可能的话,提供任何缺失的数据。我们分析了以下主要结局:死亡率或 36 周校正后年龄(PMA)时 BPD 的复合结局。次要结局为:复合结局的组成部分;院内发病率和肺部结局以及长期神经发育后遗症。我们使用 Review Manager 5 进行数据分析,并使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。
本综述纳入了 16 项研究,其中 15 项研究纳入了定量综合分析。两项试验研究了多种方案,因此被纳入了多项比较。仅纳入了研究地塞米松的 RCT。8 项研究共纳入 306 名参与者,调查了累积剂量;这些试验根据累积剂量进行分类,“低”为<2mg/kg,“中”为 2-4mg/kg,“高”>4mg/kg;3 项研究对比了高与中累积剂量,5 项研究对比了中与低累积地塞米松剂量。由于事件数量少,以及选择、失访和报告偏倚的风险,我们将证据的确定性评为低至极低。总体分析研究高剂量与低剂量方案显示,在 BPD、36 周 PMA 时死亡率或 BPD 的复合结局或幸存者的异常神经发育结局方面无差异。尽管高剂量与低剂量方案比较的亚组差异无统计学意义(Chi²=2.91,df=1(P=0.09),I²=65.7%),但在中剂量方案与高剂量方案的亚组分析中,在幸存者中脑瘫的发生率较高。在这个亚组分析中,接受中剂量方案的婴儿发生脑瘫的风险增加(RR 6.85,95%CI 1.29 至 36.36;RD 0.23,95%CI 0.08 至 0.37;P=0.02;I²=0%;NNTH 5,95%CI 2.6 至 12.7;2 项研究,74 名婴儿)。高剂量与低剂量方案比较的死亡率或脑瘫、死亡和异常神经发育结局的联合结局存在亚组差异(Chi²=4.25,df=1(P=0.04),I²=76.5%;和 Chi²=7.11,df=1(P=0.008),I²=85.9%)。在比较高剂量地塞米松与中累积剂量方案的亚组分析中,死亡或脑瘫(RR 3.20,95%CI 1.35 至 7.58;RD 0.25,95%CI 0.09 至 0.41;P=0.002;I²=0%;NNTH 5,95%CI 2.4 至 13.6;2 项研究,84 名婴儿;中等确定性证据)和死亡或异常神经发育结局(RR 3.41,95%CI 1.44 至 8.07;RD 0.28,95%CI 0.11 至 0.44;P=0.0009;I²=0%;NNTH 4,95%CI 2.2 至 10.4;2 项研究,84 名婴儿;中等确定性证据)存在亚组差异。中剂量与低剂量方案无差异。5 项研究共纳入 797 名婴儿,比较了地塞米松的早期治疗与中度早期或延迟治疗,整体分析显示主要结局无显著差异。两项比较连续与脉冲地塞米松方案的 RCT 显示,使用脉冲治疗时,联合结局死亡或 BPD 的风险增加。最后,三项比较标准方案与地塞米松个体化疗程的试验显示,主要结局和长期神经发育结局无差异。我们将上述所有讨论的比较的 GRADE 证据确定性评为中度至非常低,因为所有比较的有效性均受到以下因素的影响:偏倚风险不明确或高、随机婴儿样本量小、研究人群和设计异质性、非方案化使用“抢救”皮质类固醇以及大多数研究缺乏长期神经发育数据。
目前关于不同皮质类固醇方案对死亡率、肺部发病率和长期神经发育损伤结局的影响的证据非常不确定。尽管研究高剂量与低剂量方案显示高剂量方案可能降低死亡率或神经发育损伤的发生率,但基于目前的证据水平,我们不能确定预防早产儿 BPD 的最佳类型、剂量或开始时间的皮质类固醇。需要进一步开展高质量的试验,以确定最佳的全身应用皮质类固醇剂量方案。