Suppr超能文献

危重症成人无创血压监测的准确性。

Accuracy of Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Critically Ill Adults.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington DC, USA.

Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jul;39(7):665-671. doi: 10.1177/08850666231225173. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) is routinely invasively monitored by an arterial catheter in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the available data comparing the accuracy of noninvasive methods to arterial catheters for measuring BP in the ICU are limited by small numbers and diverse methodologies. To determine agreement between invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring (IABP) and noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) in critically ill patients. This was a single center, observational study of critical ill adults in a tertiary care facility evaluating agreement (≤10% difference) between simultaneously measured IABP and NIBP. We measured clinical features at time of BP measurement inclusive of patient demographics, laboratory data, severity of illness, specific interventions (mechanical ventilation and dialysis), and vasopressor dose to identify particular clinical scenarios in which measurement agreement is more or less likely. Of the 1852 critically ill adults with simultaneous IABP and NIBP readings, there was a median difference of 6 mm Hg in mean arterial pressure (MAP), interquartile range (1-12),  < .01. A logistic regression analysis identified 5 independent predictors of measurement discrepancy: increasing doses of norepinephrine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.10 [95% confidence interval, CI 1.08-1.12]  = .03 for every change in 5 µg/min), lower MAP value (aOR 0.98 [0.98-0.99]  < .01 for every change in 1 mm Hg), higher body mass index (aOR 1.04 [1.01-1.09]  = .01 for an increase in 1), increased patient age (aOR 1.31 [1.30-1.37]  < .01 for every 10 years), and radial arterial line location (aOR 1.74 [1.16-2.47]  = .04). There was broad agreement between IABP and NIBP in critically ill patients over a range of BPs and severity of illness. Several variables are associated with measurement discrepancy; however, their predictive capacity is modest. This may guide future study into which patients may specifically benefit from an arterial catheter.

摘要

血压(BP)在重症监护病房(ICU)中通常通过动脉导管进行有创监测。然而,由于数据数量有限且方法多样,目前可用的数据比较了 ICU 中测量血压的非侵入性方法与动脉导管的准确性。 目的是确定在危重病患者中,有创动脉血压监测(IABP)与非侵入性血压(NIBP)之间的一致性。 这是一项在一家三级护理机构中对重症成人进行的单中心观察性研究,评估了同时测量的 IABP 和 NIBP 之间的一致性(≤10%的差异)。我们在测量血压时测量了临床特征,包括患者人口统计学、实验室数据、疾病严重程度、特定干预措施(机械通气和透析)和血管加压药剂量,以确定测量一致性更有可能或不太可能的特定临床情况。 在 1852 名同时进行 IABP 和 NIBP 读数的重症成人中,平均动脉压(MAP)的中位数差异为 6mmHg,四分位距(1-12),<.01。逻辑回归分析确定了 5 个测量差异的独立预测因素:去甲肾上腺素剂量增加(调整优势比[OR]1.10[95%置信区间,CI 1.08-1.12] = .03,每增加 5μg/min),MAP 值较低(OR 0.98[0.98-0.99] < .01,每降低 1mmHg),身体质量指数较高(OR 1.04[1.01-1.09] = .01,每增加 1),患者年龄增加(OR 1.31[1.30-1.37] < .01,每增加 10 岁),桡动脉置管位置(OR 1.74[1.16-2.47] = .04)。 在各种血压和疾病严重程度范围内,IABP 和 NIBP 在危重病患者中具有广泛的一致性。有几个变量与测量差异有关;然而,它们的预测能力是适度的。这可能指导未来的研究,了解哪些患者可能特别受益于动脉导管。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验