Suppr超能文献

对出生体重低于500克的婴儿进行无创血压监测的可行性。

The feasibility of noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in infants with a birth weight under 500 grams.

作者信息

Kim Soo Hyun, Jung Euiseok, Han Hyo Myung, Lee Ka Young, Lee Sookyoung, Heo Eun A, Kim Min-Ju, Lee Jung-Bok, Lee Byong Sop, Kim Ellen Ai-Rhan, Kim Ki-Soo

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Pediatric Nursing, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 2025 Sep 9. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02415-w.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify agreement between oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and invasive arterial blood pressure (IBP) in infants <500 g during the first postnatal week.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort of infants with a birth weight <500 g admitted to a tertiary NICU (2011-2023). Paired IBP-NIBP readings obtained within 1 min were analyzed. Bland-Altman plots quantified bias and 95% limits of agreement for systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP).

RESULTS

Thirty-six infants (median gestation of 26.2 weeks) contributed 337 paired measurements. Mean (±SD) IBP vs. NIBP were 47.3  ±  10.4 vs. 49.4  ±  9.3 mm Hg (SBP), 29.2  ±  7.0 vs. 28.3  ±  8.2 mm Hg (DBP) and 35.1  ±  7.7 vs. 35.2  ±  7.9 mm Hg (MAP). Mean bias was +2.1 ±  6.8 mm Hg (SBP), -0.9  ±  6.7 mm Hg (DBP) and +0.1 ± 5.4 mm Hg (MAP), satisfying AAMI/ESH/ISO criteria (≤5 mm Hg mean difference, ≤8 mm Hg SD). Bias remained <3 mm Hg without inotropes; MAP bias rose to +1.3 mm Hg with inotropic support.

CONCLUSION

Oscillometric NIBP compared to IBP provided acceptable agreement in hemodynamically stable neonates <500 g. Whereas, invasive arterial monitoring remains preferable in unstable neonates.

摘要

目的

量化出生后第一周内体重<500g婴儿的示波法无创血压(NIBP)与有创动脉血压(IBP)之间的一致性。

研究设计

对一所三级新生儿重症监护病房(2011 - 2023年)收治的出生体重<500g的婴儿进行回顾性队列研究。分析在1分钟内获得的配对IBP - NIBP读数。Bland - Altman图量化了收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和平均动脉压(MAP)的偏差及95%一致性界限。

结果

36名婴儿(中位孕周26.2周)贡献了337对测量值。IBP与NIBP的均值(±标准差)分别为47.3 ± 10.4与49.4 ± 9.3mmHg(SBP)、29.2 ± 7.0与28.3 ± 8.2mmHg(DBP)以及35.1 ± 7.7与35.2 ± 7.9mmHg(MAP)。平均偏差为+2.1 ± 6.8mmHg(SBP)、-0.9 ± 6.7mmHg(DBP)和+0.1 ± 5.4mmHg(MAP),满足美国医疗器械促进协会/欧洲高血压学会/国际标准化组织标准(平均差值≤5mmHg,标准差≤8mmHg)。在未使用血管活性药物时偏差仍<3mmHg;在使用血管活性药物支持时MAP偏差升至+1.3mmHg。

结论

对于体重<500g血流动力学稳定的新生儿,示波法NIBP与IBP相比具有可接受的一致性。然而,对于不稳定的新生儿,有创动脉监测仍是更可取的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验