Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States of America.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 12;19(1):e0295410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295410. eCollection 2024.
Documentation of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is a key factor in guiding future prescribing. However, incomplete documentation is common and often fails to distinguish implicated drugs as true allergies. This in turn leads to unnecessary avoidance of implicated drug classes and may result in sub-optimal prescribing. Pharmacovigilance (PV) programs utilize a systematic approach to clarify ADR documentation and are known to improve patient safety. Yet it remains unclear if PV alters prescribing. Or, if the existence of the ADR documentation itself continues to prompt avoidance of implicated drugs. To address this, our work presents a retrospective cohort study assessing if clarification of antibiotic ADRs by a hospital-wide PV team was associated with future, safe, re-prescribing at a freestanding pediatric hospital in the midwestern United States. First, we compared the likelihood of future prescribing in an antibiotic class with an active ADR, as compared to alternative drug classes, between PV-clarified and non-clarified patients. Second, we assessed differences in adverse event rates 30-days after future prescribing based on PV clarification status. For robustness, analyses were performed on patients with ADRs in four antibiotic classes: penicillin-based beta-lactams (n = 45,642), sulfonamides/trimethoprim (n = 5,329), macrolides (n = 3,959), and glycopeptides (n = 622). Results illustrate that clarification of an ADR by PV was associated with an increased odds of future prescribing in the same drug class (Odds Ratio [95%-CI]): penicillin-based beta-lactams (1.59 [1.36-1.89]), sulfonamides/trimethoprim (2.29 [0.89-4.91]), macrolides (0.77 [0.33-1.61]), and glycopeptide (1.85 [1.12-3.20]). Notably, patients clarified by PV experienced no increase in the rate of adverse events within 30-days following the prescribing of antibiotics in the same class as an active ADR. Overall, this study provides strong evidence that PV reviews safely increase the rate of re-prescribing antibiotics even in the presence of an existing implicated drug ADR.
药物不良反应(ADR)的文档记录是指导未来处方的关键因素。然而,文档记录不完整的情况很常见,并且常常无法将疑似药物区分开来作为真正的过敏药物。这反过来又导致不必要地避免使用疑似药物类别,可能导致处方效果不佳。药物警戒(PV)计划采用系统的方法来澄清 ADR 文档记录,并且已知可以提高患者安全性。然而,目前尚不清楚 PV 是否会改变处方,或者 ADR 文档记录的存在是否会继续促使避免使用疑似药物。为了解决这个问题,我们的工作进行了一项回顾性队列研究,评估了在美国中西部一家独立儿科医院,由医院范围内的 PV 团队澄清抗生素 ADR 是否与未来安全重新处方有关。首先,我们比较了在有 ADR 活动的抗生素类别与替代药物类别之间,在接受 PV 澄清和未澄清的患者中,未来处方的可能性。其次,我们根据 PV 澄清状态评估了未来处方后 30 天内不良事件发生率的差异。为了稳健性,我们在四个抗生素类别中的患者中进行了分析:青霉素类β-内酰胺类(n = 45642)、磺胺类/甲氧苄啶(n = 5329)、大环内酯类(n = 3959)和糖肽类(n = 622)。结果表明,PV 澄清 ADR 与同一药物类别中未来处方的可能性增加有关(优势比[95%-CI]):青霉素类β-内酰胺类(1.59[1.36-1.89])、磺胺类/甲氧苄啶(2.29[0.89-4.91])、大环内酯类(0.77[0.33-1.61])和糖肽类(1.85[1.12-3.20])。值得注意的是,在接受 PV 澄清的患者中,在同一类别中开具 ADR 活性抗生素后的 30 天内,不良事件的发生率没有增加。总体而言,这项研究提供了强有力的证据表明,即使存在现有的疑似药物 ADR,PV 审查也可以安全地提高重新处方抗生素的比例。