Suppr超能文献

JAK 抑制剂在类风湿关节炎中的疗效和安全性:临床医生的最新进展。

Efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: update for the practising clinician.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2024 Feb;20(2):101-115. doi: 10.1038/s41584-023-01062-9. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

Abstract

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib, are increasingly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There has been debate about their safety, particularly following the issuance of guidance by regulatory agencies advising caution in their use in certain patients. The registrational clinical trials and registry data of JAK inhibitors did not identify a difference in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), venous thromboembolism, malignancies or infections (other than herpes zoster) with a JAK inhibitor versus a biologic DMARD. In the ORAL Surveillance trial, which enrolled patients >50 years of age with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, tofacitinib was statistically inferior to TNF inhibitors for the occurrence of MACEs and malignancy. Further post hoc analysis of the data revealed that an age of ≥65 years, a high baseline cardiovascular risk, a history of smoking, sustained inflammation, disease activity and suboptimal treatment of cardiovascular comorbidities all increase the risk of these outcomes. The guidance issued by regulatory agencies should be carefully considered to ensure appropriate and safe treatment of patients with RA without undertreatment of patients who might benefit from JAK inhibitor, as well as biologic, treatment. As always, the risks associated with the use of these agents, treatment goals, costs and patient preferences should be discussed with the patient.

摘要

Janus 激酶 (JAK) 抑制剂,包括托法替尼、巴瑞替尼、乌帕替尼和菲卓替尼,在类风湿关节炎 (RA) 的治疗中越来越多地被使用。关于它们的安全性一直存在争议,尤其是在监管机构发布指导意见建议在某些患者中谨慎使用之后。JAK 抑制剂的注册临床试验和注册数据并未发现与生物 DMARD 相比,JAK 抑制剂在主要不良心血管事件 (MACEs)、静脉血栓栓塞、恶性肿瘤或感染(除带状疱疹外)方面的风险存在差异。在纳入了≥1 个心血管危险因素、年龄>50 岁的患者的 ORAL Surveillance 试验中,与 TNF 抑制剂相比,托法替尼在 MACEs 和恶性肿瘤的发生方面统计学上处于劣势。对数据的进一步事后分析显示,年龄≥65 岁、基线心血管风险高、吸烟史、持续炎症、疾病活动度和心血管合并症的治疗不充分都会增加这些结局的风险。监管机构发布的指导意见应仔细考虑,以确保 RA 患者得到适当和安全的治疗,避免对可能受益于 JAK 抑制剂、生物制剂治疗的患者治疗不足,同时还应考虑到这些药物的使用风险、治疗目标、成本和患者偏好。与患者讨论这些药物的使用风险、治疗目标、成本和患者偏好至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验