Institute of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Wenzhou Safety (Emergency) Institute, Tianjin University, Wenzhou, China.
Respir Res. 2024 Jan 12;25(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02675-8.
Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) has been widely used for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in recent years. However, the role of hemoadsorption in ARDS patients requiring VV ECMO is unclear.
Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to describe the effect of hemoadsorption on outcomes of ARDS patients requiring VV ECMO and elucidate the risk factors for adverse outcomes. We conducted and reported a systematic literature review based on the principles derived from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The systematic review searched Embase, CINHAL, and Pubmed databases for studies on ARDS patients receiving hemoadsorption and VV ECMO. The demographic data, clinical data and biological data of the patients were collected.
We ultimately included a total of 8 articles including 189 patients. We characterized the population both clinically and biologically. Our review showed most studies described reductions in inflammatory markers and fluid resuscitation drug dosage in ARDS patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or sepsis after hemoadsorption.
Because most of the studies have the characteristics of high heterogeneity, we could only draw very cautious conclusions that hemoadsorption therapy may enhance hemodynamic stability in ARDS patients with COVID-19 or sepsis receiving VV ECMO support. However, our results do not allow us to draw conclusions that hemoadsorption could reduce inflammation and mortality. Prospective randomized controlled studies with a larger sample size are needed in the future to verify the role of hemoadsorption in ARDS patients requiring VV ECMO.
近年来,静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV ECMO)已广泛用于治疗严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。然而,对于需要 VV ECMO 的 ARDS 患者,血液吸附的作用尚不清楚。
因此,我们进行了一项系统评价,以描述血液吸附对需要 VV ECMO 的 ARDS 患者结局的影响,并阐明不良结局的危险因素。我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明的原则进行并报告了系统文献评价。该系统评价在 Embase、CINHAL 和 Pubmed 数据库中搜索了接受血液吸附和 VV ECMO 的 ARDS 患者的研究。收集了患者的人口统计学数据、临床数据和生物学数据。
我们最终共纳入 8 项研究,共 189 例患者。我们从临床和生物学两个方面对人群进行了描述。我们的综述表明,大多数研究描述了 COVID-19 或脓毒症导致的 ARDS 患者在接受血液吸附后炎症标志物和液体复苏药物剂量减少。
由于大多数研究具有高度异质性的特点,我们只能非常谨慎地得出结论,即血液吸附治疗可能增强接受 VV ECMO 支持的 COVID-19 或脓毒症 ARDS 患者的血流动力学稳定性。然而,我们的结果不允许我们得出血液吸附可以降低炎症和死亡率的结论。未来需要进行前瞻性随机对照研究,以更大的样本量验证血液吸附在需要 VV ECMO 的 ARDS 患者中的作用。