Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health, and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;108:102376. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102376. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
Internalized sexual stigma is a well-established risk factor for poor mental health among sexual minority individuals. However, there has been no synthesis of the literature pertaining to risk and protective factors that influence the development of internalized sexual stigma over time. This systematic review presents findings from 31 studies addressing this question (n = 9192); 23 studies examined psychosocial and sociodemographic predictors of internalized sexual stigma among sexual minority individuals, and eight studies tested the effects of psychological interventions on internalized sexual stigma. Longitudinal studies highlight the stability of internalized sexual stigma over time, and the role of stigma and discrimination, proximal minority stressors (e.g., outness, concealment), and psychological factors (e.g., depressive and anxious symptoms, coping styles, and demoralization) in predicting subsequent internalized sexual stigma. Demographic factors appear to play only a limited role in predicting subsequent internalized sexual stigma. Finally, most intervention studies found no significant effects in reducing internalized sexual stigma, with three exceptions finding significant intervention effects among young sexual minority individuals. We conclude by outlining a theory-driven model of internalized stigma and a research agenda to test more nuanced models of internalized stigma that include multifactorial risk indices.
内化的性污名是性少数群体个体心理健康不良的一个既定风险因素。然而,目前还没有对随时间推移影响内化性污名发展的风险和保护因素的文献进行综合分析。本系统评价呈现了 31 项研究的结果(n=9192);其中 23 项研究探讨了性少数群体个体内化性污名的社会心理和社会人口学预测因素,8 项研究检验了心理干预对内化性污名的影响。纵向研究强调了内化性污名随时间的稳定性,以及污名和歧视、近端少数群体应激源(如公开、隐瞒)和心理因素(如抑郁和焦虑症状、应对方式和士气低落)在预测随后的内化性污名方面的作用。人口统计学因素似乎在预测随后的内化性污名方面只起有限的作用。最后,大多数干预研究发现减少内化性污名的效果不显著,只有三项研究发现对年轻性少数群体个体有显著的干预效果。我们最后概述了一个内化污名的理论驱动模型和一个研究议程,以检验更细致入微的内化污名模型,包括多因素风险指数。