Peek Monica E, Lopez Fanny Y, Williams H Sharif, Xu Lucy J, McNulty Moira C, Acree M Ellen, Schneider John A
Section of General Internal Medicine, , The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2007, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, , The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31(6):677-87. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3616-3.
BACKGROUND: Enhancing patient-centered care and shared decision making (SDM) has become a national priority as a means of engaging patients in their care, improving treatment adherence, and enhancing health outcomes. Relatively little is known about the healthcare experiences or shared decision making among racial/ethnic minorities who also identify as being LGBT. The purpose of this paper is to understand how race, sexual orientation and gender identity can simultaneously influence SDM among African-American LGBT persons, and to propose a model of SDM between such patients and their healthcare providers. METHODS: We reviewed key constructs necessary for understanding SDM among African-American LGBT persons, which guided our systematic literature review. Eligible studies for the review included English-language studies of adults (≥ 19 y/o) in North America, with a focus on LGBT persons who were African-American/black (i.e., > 50 % of the study population) or included sub-analyses by sexual orientation/gender identity and race. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases using MESH terms and keywords related to shared decision making, communication quality (e.g., trust, bias), African-Americans, and LGBT persons. Additional references were identified by manual reviews of peer-reviewed journals' tables of contents and key papers' references. RESULTS: We identified 2298 abstracts, three of which met the inclusion criteria. Of the included studies, one was cross-sectional and two were qualitative; one study involved transgender women (91 % minorities, 65 % of whom were African-Americans), and two involved African-American men who have sex with men (MSM). All of the studies focused on HIV infection. Sexual orientation and gender identity were patient-reported factors that negatively impacted patient/provider relationships and SDM. Engaging in SDM helped some patients overcome normative beliefs about clinical encounters. In this paper, we present a conceptual model for understanding SDM in African-American LGBT persons, wherein multiple systems of social stratification (e.g., race, gender, sexual orientation) influence patient and provider perceptions, behaviors, and shared decision making. DISCUSSION: Few studies exist that explore SDM among African-American LGBT persons, and no interventions were identified in our systematic review. Thus, we are unable to draw conclusions about the effect size of SDM among this population on health outcomes. Qualitative work suggests that race, sexual orientation and gender work collectively to enhance perceptions of discrimination and decrease SDM among African-American LGBT persons. More research is needed to obtain a comprehensive understanding of shared decision making and subsequent health outcomes among African-Americans along the entire spectrum of gender and sexual orientation.
背景:加强以患者为中心的医疗服务和共同决策(SDM)已成为一项国家优先事项,作为让患者参与自身医疗、提高治疗依从性和改善健康结果的一种手段。对于那些同时认定自己为LGBT的少数种族/族裔群体的医疗经历或共同决策,我们所知相对较少。本文的目的是了解种族、性取向和性别认同如何同时影响非裔美国LGBT人群的共同决策,并提出这类患者与其医疗服务提供者之间的共同决策模型。 方法:我们回顾了理解非裔美国LGBT人群共同决策所需的关键概念,这指导了我们的系统文献综述。符合综述条件的研究包括北美地区针对成年人(≥19岁)的英文研究,重点关注非裔美国/黑人LGBT人群(即研究人群的>50%),或按性取向/性别认同和种族进行的亚组分析。我们使用与共同决策、沟通质量(如信任、偏见)、非裔美国人以及LGBT人群相关的医学主题词(MESH)和关键词,在PubMed、CINAHL、ProQuest学位论文与学术期刊全文数据库、PsycINFO和Scopus数据库中进行搜索。通过对同行评审期刊的目录和关键论文的参考文献进行人工检索,确定了其他参考文献。 结果:我们确定了2298篇摘要,其中3篇符合纳入标准。在纳入的研究中,1篇为横断面研究,2篇为定性研究;1项研究涉及跨性别女性(91%为少数族裔,其中65%为非裔美国人),2项研究涉及与男性发生性关系的非裔美国男性(MSM)。所有研究都聚焦于艾滋病毒感染。性取向和性别认同是患者报告的对患者/提供者关系和共同决策产生负面影响的因素。参与共同决策帮助一些患者克服了对临床诊疗的规范性观念。在本文中,我们提出了一个理解非裔美国LGBT人群共同决策的概念模型,其中多个社会分层系统(如种族、性别、性取向)影响患者和提供者的认知、行为以及共同决策。 讨论:很少有研究探讨非裔美国LGBT人群中的共同决策,并且在我们的系统综述中未发现任何干预措施。因此,我们无法就该人群中共同决策对健康结果的效应大小得出结论。定性研究表明,种族、性取向和性别共同作用,增强了非裔美国LGBT人群的歧视感,并减少了共同决策。需要更多研究以全面了解非裔美国人在整个性别和性取向范围内的共同决策及后续健康结果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-10-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-11
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010-5-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-12-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-7-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-11-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-2-17
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024-4-2
Arch Public Health. 2023-9-27
J Gen Intern Med. 2016-6
J Health Soc Behav. 2014-3
Health Commun. 2012-10-10
J Health Soc Behav. 2012-5-15