• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Zahorec 指数或中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值,是炎症和对感染、癌症及手术的免疫反应的有效生物标志物。

Zahorec index or Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, valid biomarker of inflammation and immune response to infection, cancer and surgery.

出版信息

Bratisl Lek Listy. 2024;125(2):75-83. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2024_012.

DOI:10.4149/BLL_2024_012
PMID:38219059
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For many years, the physicians are searching for easily measurable marker of immune response to the stress and inflammation. More than, 20 years ago Zahorec (2001) proposed neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as an easy available and valid biomarker of inflammation, stress, and activation of immune system.

METHODS

In this narrative review we focused on the utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (Zahorec's index) in clinical practice of general medicine (inflammation and infection), intensive medicine (sepsis), oncology (prediction of prognosis in cancer of solid organs), surgery and perioperative medicine (diagnosis of complications, and prediction of clinical outcome).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

We provide many evidences of clinical research which confirm that Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a very sensitive marker of inflammation, stress reliable and valid parameter in everyday clinical practice. NLR (Zahorec index) is an effective tool for diagnosis of infection and severity of disease of variable etiologies. NLR reflect the grade of inflammation in cancer disease, which has a significant impact on the prognosis of cancer patients. Zahorec index should be used routinely in emergency medicine, surgery and perioperative medicine as a marker of the severity of affliction, infection, and complications in general. NLR may help physicians in decision making process for early diagnosis and therapy. NLR should be investigated frequently in acute states (sepsis, shock, peritonitis, stroke, trauma) on a daily basis, in subacute states few times per week (during hospital stay), and few times per year in chronic disease (cancer, diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, psychiatry disorders). NLR has a deep biological sense connecting together function of three suprasystems: immune, endocrinne and autonomous nervous system (Tab. 2, Fig. 3, Ref. 86).

摘要

背景

多年来,医生一直在寻找一种可衡量的免疫反应标志物,以反映机体对应激和炎症的反应。20 多年前,Zahorec(2001 年)提出中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)可作为一种简单、可用且有效的炎症、应激和免疫系统激活的生物标志物。

方法

在这篇叙述性综述中,我们重点介绍了中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(Zahorec 指数)在普通医学(炎症和感染)、重症监护医学(脓毒症)、肿瘤学(实体器官癌预后预测)、外科学和围手术期医学(并发症诊断和临床结局预测)中的临床应用。

结果和结论

我们提供了许多临床研究证据,证实中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是一种非常敏感的炎症标志物,是日常临床实践中一种可靠且有效的参数。NLR(Zahorec 指数)是一种用于诊断感染和各种病因疾病严重程度的有效工具。NLR 反映了癌症疾病的炎症程度,对癌症患者的预后有重要影响。Zahorec 指数应常规用于急诊医学、外科学和围手术期医学,作为疾病严重程度、感染和并发症的标志物。NLR 可帮助医生在早期诊断和治疗方面做出决策。NLR 应在急性状态(脓毒症、休克、腹膜炎、中风、创伤)中每天频繁检查,在亚急性状态中每周数次(住院期间),在慢性疾病(癌症、糖尿病、缺血性心脏病、精神障碍)中每年数次检查。NLR 具有深刻的生物学意义,它将三个超系统(免疫、内分泌和自主神经系统)的功能联系在一起(表 2,图 3,参考文献 86)。

相似文献

1
Zahorec index or Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, valid biomarker of inflammation and immune response to infection, cancer and surgery.Zahorec 指数或中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值,是炎症和对感染、癌症及手术的免疫反应的有效生物标志物。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2024;125(2):75-83. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2024_012.
2
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, past, present and future perspectives.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值:过去、现在和未来的展望。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2021;122(7):474-488. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2021_078.
3
Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts--rapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞计数比值——危重症患者全身炎症和应激的快速简便指标。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2001;102(1):5-14.
4
Utility of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as an Indicator of Disease Severity and Prognostic Marker among Patients with Covid-19 Infection in a Tertiary Care Centre in Bangalore - A Retrospective Study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)在班加罗尔一家三级护理中心的新冠病毒感染患者中的疾病严重程度和预后标志物的应用:一项回顾性研究。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2022 Apr;70(4):11-12.
5
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio: An Emerging Marker of the Relationships between the Immune System and Diseases.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值:免疫系统与疾病关系的新兴标志物。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 26;23(7):3636. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073636.
6
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a marker of vasculitis activity, severe infection and mortality in anca-associated vasculitis: A retrospective study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体相关性血管炎活动、严重感染和死亡的标志物:一项回顾性研究。
Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2021 May-Jun;41(3):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
7
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker of mortality and disease severity in septic Acute kidney injury Patients: A retrospective study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为脓毒症急性肾损伤患者死亡率和疾病严重程度的预后标志物:一项回顾性研究。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2023 Mar;116:109778. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.109778. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
8
Systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio can predict clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab.系统免疫炎症指数、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值可预测纳武利尤单抗治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌患者的临床结局。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Oct;33(8):e22964. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22964. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
9
Can neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio be independent risk factor for predicting acute kidney injury in patients with severe sepsis?中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值能否作为预测严重脓毒症患者急性肾损伤的独立危险因素?
Ren Fail. 2015 Mar;37(2):225-9. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2014.982477. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
10
Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in odontogenic infection: a systematic review.牙源性感染中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的系统评价。
Head Face Med. 2024 Mar 28;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00421-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Nomogram to Predict Multidrug-Resistant Pulmonary Infections Based on Data from Neurosurgery Ward Patients.基于神经外科病房患者数据的预测多重耐药肺部感染列线图的疗效评估
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Jul 26;18:3723-3734. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S527114. eCollection 2025.
2
Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios correlate with increased clozapine concentration-to-dose ratios during titration.在滴定过程中,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值升高与氯氮平血药浓度-剂量比值增加相关。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Jul 10;11(1):96. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00648-4.
3
Predictive utility of systemic inflammatory markers in differentiating laryngeal lesions.
全身炎症标志物在鉴别喉部病变中的预测效用
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09550-2.
4
Topoisomerase IIIβ protects from tumorigenesis and immune dysregulation.拓扑异构酶IIIβ可预防肿瘤发生和免疫失调。
bioRxiv. 2025 Mar 15:2025.03.13.643061. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.13.643061.
5
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as potential predictors of nosocomial infection in patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A cohort study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值作为静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合患者医院感染的潜在预测指标:一项队列研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0325316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325316. eCollection 2025.
6
Dynamic changes in peripheral inflammation as a risk factor for perioperative sleep disturbances in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatobiliary surgery.外周炎症的动态变化作为老年腹腔镜肝胆手术患者围手术期睡眠障碍的一个危险因素。
Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 16;16:1537780. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1537780. eCollection 2025.
7
Postoperative Delirium and Cognitive Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery: The Role of Inflammation and Clinical Risk Factors.心脏手术后的术后谵妄与认知功能障碍:炎症及临床风险因素的作用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;15(7):844. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070844.
8
Advanced Assessment of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Military Personnel: Development of a Novel IIRPM Score Using Artificial Intelligence.军事人员氧化应激和炎症的高级评估:利用人工智能开发一种新型IIRPM评分系统
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 25;15(7):832. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070832.
9
Systemic Inflammatory Markers as Prognostic Factors in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue.全身炎症标志物作为舌部口腔鳞状细胞癌的预后因素
Biomedicines. 2025 Mar 20;13(3):754. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030754.
10
Polymer-Based Scaffolds as an Implantable Material in Regenerative Dentistry: A Review.基于聚合物的支架作为再生牙科中的可植入材料:综述
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Feb 24;16(3):80. doi: 10.3390/jfb16030080.