Suppr超能文献

急诊医护人员在有限培训下进行肾脏即时护理超声检查与肾绞痛患者 30 天结局。

Renal point-of-care ultrasound performed by ED staff with limited training and 30-day outcomes in patients with renal colic.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, 1, Jurong East Street 21, Singapore, 609606, Singapore.

出版信息

CJEM. 2024 Mar;26(3):198-203. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00645-5. Epub 2024 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Emergency Department (ED) renal point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) in renal colic by accredited specialists has good prognostic value. This may not be generalizable to under-resourced EDs. We investigated PoCUS in renal colic in our ED with lesser training.

METHODS

We performed a single-centre health records review of adult ED patients with renal colic and PoCUS. Patients were managed by a non-ED specialist/resident doctor with no POCUS accreditation in consultation with an attending. These doctors attended a 3.5-h training session conducted by accredited attendings to examine hydronephrosis. They needed to verify their PoCUS findings with an attending during the first two weeks of their six-month posting before performing it independently. The primary outcome was 30-day urological procedures in hydronephrotic vs. non-hydronephrotic groups. Secondary outcomes were the distribution of primary outcome with grades of hydronephrosis, 30-day ED nephrolithiasis-related reattendances in hydronephrotic vs. non-hydronephrotic groups and its distribution with grades of hydronephrosis. We compared outcomes using Fisher's exact test. We also reported crude odds ratio (COR) and 95% CI of primary outcome between hydronephrotic vs. non-hydronephrotic groups. p values ≤ 0.05 were significant.

RESULTS

We recruited 651 patients; 160 (24.6%) without and 491 (75.4%) with hydronephrosis. Rates of grades of hydronephrosis were: mild (76.6%), moderate (13.8%), severe (1.2%) and undifferentiated (8.4%). There was a difference in 30-day urological procedures (rates [95% CI]) in hydronephrotic vs. non-hydronephrotic groups, 11.2 [8.7-14.0]% vs. 2.5 [1.0-6.3]%; p < 0.001; COR (95% CI) 4.9 (1.8-13.8); p = 0.002. Increasing 30-day urological procedural rates were associated with increasing grade of hydronephrosis [no: 2.5%, mild: 7.7%, moderate: 23.5%, severe: 67.0% and undifferentiated: 14.6%; p < 0.001]. No differences occurred in other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal PoCUS could be performed by non-ED specialist/resident doctors to identify patients without hydronephrosis who rarely required urological intervention. Hydronephrotic patients could benefit from further risk stratification.

摘要

背景与目的

在配备有认证专家的急诊科(ED)中,针对肾绞痛进行的肾脏即时超声检查(PoCUS)具有良好的预后价值。但这种方法可能不适用于资源匮乏的 ED。本研究旨在我们的 ED 中,在医生接受较少培训的情况下,调查肾绞痛的 PoCUS 检查结果。

方法

我们对因肾绞痛到我院 ED 就诊的成年患者进行了单中心病历回顾。由非 ED 专科医生/住院医生进行检查,这些医生没有接受过 PoCUS 认证,而是在主治医生的会诊下进行检查。这些医生参加了由认证主治医生进行的为期 3.5 小时的培训课程,以检查肾积水。在开始独立检查之前的头两周内,他们需要与主治医生一起验证他们的 PoCUS 检查结果。主要结局是在积水组和非积水组中,30 天内进行泌尿科手术的情况。次要结局是积水组与非积水组中 30 天 ED 肾结石相关再就诊的分布情况,以及积水程度与再就诊分布的关系。我们使用 Fisher 确切检验比较了结果。我们还报告了积水组与非积水组之间主要结局的粗比值比(COR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。p 值≤0.05 为有统计学意义。

结果

我们共招募了 651 名患者,其中 160 名(24.6%)无积水,491 名(75.4%)有积水。积水程度的分级为:轻度(76.6%)、中度(13.8%)、重度(1.2%)和未分级(8.4%)。积水组与非积水组 30 天内泌尿科手术的比例存在差异(率[95%CI]):11.2%[8.7-14.0]% vs. 2.5%[1.0-6.3]%;p<0.001;COR(95%CI)为 4.9(1.8-13.8);p=0.002。30 天内泌尿科手术的比例随着积水程度的增加而增加[无:2.5%,轻度:7.7%,中度:23.5%,重度:67.0%,未分级:14.6%;p<0.001]。其他次要结局没有差异。

结论

非 ED 专科医生/住院医生可以进行肾脏 PoCUS 检查,以识别出很少需要泌尿科干预的无积水患者。积水患者可以从进一步的风险分层中获益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验