Li Xi
Center for Judaic and Interreligious Studies of Shandong University, Qingjiao Building 4-1-202, Erhuangdong Road, 12550, Shizhong Qu, Jinan, 250002, Shandong, China.
J Relig Health. 2024 Aug;63(4):2671-2689. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01987-1. Epub 2024 Jan 14.
Since the new millennium, biblical scholars have begun to reread certain writings in the Hebrew Bible through the concepts of post-traumatic stress disorder and post-traumatic growth. Some scholars believe such a reading is legitimate, whereas others think it problematic, and still, others hold a midway perspective. This article argues for the midway, the position that accepts the applicability of the Hebrew Bible to today's psychological concepts but calls for caution. Because ancient Israelites reacted to traumatic events and distinguished the human mind from the body like modern people, it is reasonable to approach their thoughts and emotions in the Hebrew Bible through today's psychological concepts. However, the cultural differences between today's society and ancient Israelites in understanding and reacting to traumatic events should be considered.
自新千年以来,圣经学者们开始通过创伤后应激障碍和创伤后成长的概念重新解读希伯来圣经中的某些经文。一些学者认为这种解读是合理的,而另一些学者则认为它存在问题,还有一些学者持中间立场。本文主张中间立场,即接受希伯来圣经对当今心理学概念的适用性,但同时呼吁谨慎对待。由于古代以色列人对创伤性事件的反应以及将人类的心智与身体区分开来的方式与现代人相似,因此通过当今的心理学概念来探讨他们在希伯来圣经中的思想和情感是合理的。然而,应当考虑当今社会与古代以色列人在理解和应对创伤性事件方面的文化差异。