Loo Shang Jun, Lim Cheng Yee, Heng Paul Wan Sia, Chan Lai Wah
GEA-NUS Pharmaceutical Processing Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
GEA-NUS Pharmaceutical Processing Research Laboratory, Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Int J Pharm. 2024 Mar 5;652:123806. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.123806. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
Minitablets are prepared using multiple die openings and multi-tip punches for greater productivity. With multiple tips on the punch barrel, the overall compaction force to be applied is commonly estimated by multiplying the desired compaction force per tip by the number of punch tips. Few researchers have however examined this proportionality and the effects of the number of punch tips and punch face geometry on the critical quality attributes (CQAs) of high drug load minitablets. In this study, the minitablets prepared by multi-tip tools exhibited greater weight variation than those prepared by single-tip tools. Their compaction was accompanied by a longer dwell time that led to a higher minitablet tensile strength and consequently a longer disintegration time. The compaction forces required to achieve a consistent set of minitablet CQAs were not directly proportional to the number of punch tips used. In comparison, the effect of punch face geometry was negligible. Increasing concentration of magnesium stearate (as lubricant) from 0.75 to 1.25 %, w/w reduced weight variation, especially of minitablets prepared by the multi-tip tools. It also increased the disintegration time but had no significant effect on the tensile strength of the minitablets regardless of type of tools used. The adjustment of compaction speed was an effective compensatory method to mitigate the differences in dwell time and tensile strength between minitablets prepared by single-tip and multi-tip standard concave tools. A larger reduction in compaction speed of the single-tip tools was required at higher compaction pressures.
微型片采用多个模孔和多尖端冲头制备,以提高生产效率。由于冲头杆上有多个尖端,通常通过将每个尖端所需的压实力乘以冲头尖端的数量来估算要施加的总压实力。然而,很少有研究人员研究这种比例关系以及冲头尖端数量和冲头表面几何形状对高载药量微型片关键质量属性(CQAs)的影响。在本研究中,用多尖端工具制备的微型片比用单尖端工具制备的微型片表现出更大的重量差异。它们在压实过程中具有更长的保压时间,这导致微型片的抗张强度更高,因此崩解时间更长。实现一组一致的微型片CQAs所需的压实力与所用冲头尖端的数量并非直接成正比。相比之下,冲头表面几何形状的影响可以忽略不计。将硬脂酸镁(作为润滑剂)的浓度从0.75%(w/w)提高到1.25%可减少重量差异,尤其是多尖端工具制备的微型片。这也增加了崩解时间,但无论使用何种工具类型,对微型片的抗张强度均无显著影响。调整压实速度是一种有效的补偿方法,可减轻单尖端和多尖端标准凹形工具制备的微型片在保压时间和抗张强度方面的差异。在较高的压实压力下,单尖端工具需要更大幅度地降低压实速度。