Tan Xin-Yuan, Yao Yao, Xiao Jing-Min, Chen Yuan-Bin, Lin Ming, Zhang Xiao-Shan, Cai Dan-Yan, Wu Zhen-Hu, Sun Li-Li, Fan Fei-Ting, Xu Yin-Ji
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Chronic Respiratory Disease and Chinese Medicine Research Team, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Chin J Integr Med. 2025 May;31(5):441-447. doi: 10.1007/s11655-024-3569-z. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a hospital-made resuscitation pack, a Chinese medicinal herbal compound formula designed to enhance recovery in post-bronchoscopy patients.
In this randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to either the treatment or control groups. The patients in the treatment group applied the resuscitation pack, which contained aromatic compounded Chinese herbs. The patients in the control group applied a hospital-made, single herb placebo pack. Packs were placed on the Tiantu (CV 22) acupuncture point for 4 h as soon as the bronchoscopy finished. Efficacy indicators, such as recovery time, patients' symptoms including nausea and dizziness, and adverse events (AEs) were observed and compared. The outcome indices were evaluated at baseline, 1 and 24 h after the bronchoscopy. Subgroup analysis was further performed by patients' age and depth of sedation.
When applying generalized estimating equations (GEE) to evaluate the intensity of post-bronchoscopy nausea and vomiting, the intensity was lower in the treatment group (163 cases) compared with the control group (162 cases; 95% CI: 0.004, 0.099, P=0.03]. Also, significantly lower intensity of nausea was observed in the 60-70 years of age subgroup (95% CI: 0.029, 0.169, P=0.006) and deep sedation subgroup (95% CI: 0.002, 0.124; P=0.04). There was no significant difference in dizziness between two groups by GEE (95% CI: -0.134, 0.297; P=0.459). In addition, no serious AEs were observed in either group.
Our study found that the resuscitation pack markedly improved patients' symptoms by reducing nausea and vomiting after bronchoscopy without AEs, compared with placebo in the perioperative period. (Trial registration No. ChiCTR2000038299).
评估医院自制的复苏包(一种旨在促进支气管镜检查术后患者恢复的中药复方制剂)的疗效和安全性。
在这项随机、单盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验中,符合条件的患者按1:1随机分配至治疗组或对照组。治疗组患者使用包含芳香类复方中药的复苏包,对照组患者使用医院自制的单味药安慰剂包。支气管镜检查结束后,将药包置于天突穴(CV 22)4小时。观察并比较恢复时间、恶心和头晕等患者症状以及不良事件(AE)等疗效指标。在支气管镜检查前、检查后1小时和24小时评估结局指标。进一步按患者年龄和镇静深度进行亚组分析。
应用广义估计方程(GEE)评估支气管镜检查术后恶心和呕吐的强度时,治疗组(163例)的强度低于对照组(162例;95%CI:0.004,0.099,P = 0.03)。此外,在60 - 70岁年龄亚组(95%CI:0.029,0.169,P = 0.006)和深度镇静亚组(95%CI:0.002,0.124;P = 0.04)中观察到恶心强度显著更低。通过GEE分析,两组头晕情况无显著差异(95%CI:-0.134,0.297;P = 0.459)。此外,两组均未观察到严重不良事件。
我们的研究发现,与围手术期安慰剂相比,复苏包在支气管镜检查后通过减轻恶心和呕吐显著改善了患者症状,且无不良事件发生。(试验注册号:ChiCTR2000038299)