• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量中国医疗器械植入物利益相关者偏好的离散选择实验

Quantifying stakeholders' preference for implantable medical devices in China: a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.

School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Jan 15;40(1):e8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002799.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462323002799
PMID:38221900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10859836/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to gain insight into each attribute as presented in the value of implantable medical devices, quantify attributes' strength and their relative importance, and identify the determinants of stakeholders' preferences.

METHODS

A mixed-methods design was used to identify attributes and levels reflecting stakeholders' preference toward the value of implantable medical devices. This design combined literature reviewing, expert's consultation, one-on-one interactions with stakeholders, and a pilot testing. Based on the design, six attributes and their levels were settled. Among 144 hypothetical profiles, 30 optimal choice sets were developed, and healthcare professionals (decision-makers, health technology assessment experts, hospital administrators, medical doctors) and patients as stakeholders in China were surveyed. A total of 134 respondents participated in the survey. Results were analyzed by mixed logit model and conditional logit model.

RESULTS

The results of the mixed logit model showed that all the six attributes had a significant impact on respondents' choices on implantable medical devices. Respondents were willing to pay the highest for medical devices that provided improvements in clinical safety, followed by increased clinical effectiveness, technology for treating severe diseases, improved implement capacity, and innovative technology (without substitutes).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of DCE will improve the current evaluation on the value of implantable medical devices in China and provide decision-makers with the relative importance of the criteria in pricing and reimbursement decision-making of implantable medical devices.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在深入了解医疗器械植入物价值呈现的各项属性,量化属性的强度及其相对重要性,并确定利益相关者偏好的决定因素。

方法

采用混合方法设计来确定反映利益相关者对医疗器械植入物价值偏好的属性和水平。该设计结合了文献回顾、专家咨询、与利益相关者的一对一互动以及试点测试。基于该设计,确定了六个属性及其水平。在 144 个假设概况中,开发了 30 个最优选择集,并对中国的医疗保健专业人员(决策者、卫生技术评估专家、医院管理人员、医生)和患者等利益相关者进行了调查。共有 134 名受访者参与了调查。结果通过混合对数模型和条件对数模型进行分析。

结果

混合对数模型的结果表明,所有六个属性对受访者对医疗器械植入物的选择都有重大影响。受访者愿意为在临床安全性方面提供改进、提高临床效果、治疗严重疾病的技术、提高实施能力以及创新技术(无替代品)的医疗器械支付最高费用。

结论

DCE 的研究结果将改进中国目前对医疗器械植入物价值的评估,并为决策者提供医疗器械定价和报销决策中标准的相对重要性信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511d/11569963/445796af1980/S0266462323002799_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511d/11569963/445796af1980/S0266462323002799_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511d/11569963/445796af1980/S0266462323002799_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying stakeholders' preference for implantable medical devices in China: a discrete choice experiment.定量中国医疗器械植入物利益相关者偏好的离散选择实验
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Jan 15;40(1):e8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002799.
2
Eliciting preferences for medical devices in South Korea: A discrete choice experiment.了解韩国对医疗设备的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Health Policy. 2017 Mar;121(3):243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
3
Societal preferences for funding orphan drugs in China: An application of the discrete choice experiment method.中国社会对孤儿药资助的偏好:离散选择实验方法的应用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 12;10:1005453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1005453. eCollection 2022.
4
Public preferences for online medical consultations in China: a discrete choice experiment.公众对中国在线医疗咨询的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 13;11:1282387. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282387. eCollection 2023.
5
Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.中国 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,患者对人工智能应用与临床医生在疾病诊断中的偏好:离散选择实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 23;23(2):e22841. doi: 10.2196/22841.
6
Attribute nonattendance in COVID-19 vaccine choice: A discrete choice experiment based on Chinese public preference.对 COVID-19 疫苗选择的属性非参与:基于中国公众偏好的离散选择实验。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):959-970. doi: 10.1111/hex.13439. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
7
Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.收集医师对医疗器械的偏好:我们做对了吗?意大利骨科医生使用 2 种不同的陈述偏好方法得出的证据。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Oct-Nov;43(7-8):886-900. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231201805. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
8
Preference of primary care patients for home-based healthcare and support services: a discrete choice experiment in China.基层医疗患者对居家医疗保健和支持服务的偏好:中国的一项离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1324776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324776. eCollection 2024.
9
A Study of Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Western China: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.中国西部非小细胞肺癌患者治疗偏好的研究:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 26;9:653450. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.653450. eCollection 2021.
10
Patient Preferences for Attributes that Characterise Alternative Models of Care in Gastroenterology: A Discrete Choice Experiment.患者对胃肠病学中替代护理模式特征属性的偏好:离散选择实验。
Patient. 2023 Mar;16(2):165-177. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00609-4. Epub 2023 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A multi-stakeholder multicriteria decision analysis for implantable medical devices assessment in China.中国植入式医疗器械评估的多利益相关方多标准决策分析
Front Health Serv. 2025 Aug 29;5:1650709. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1650709. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Stent-Related Adverse Events >1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.支架相关不良事件 >1 年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 18;75(6):590-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.058.
2
Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria.信息准则的灵敏度和特异性。
Brief Bioinform. 2020 Mar 23;21(2):553-565. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz016.
3
Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for health technology assessment: the Queensland Health experience.用于卫生技术评估的多标准决策分析(MCDA):昆士兰卫生部门的经验
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Oct;43(5):591-599. doi: 10.1071/AH18042.
4
Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices.医疗器械随机临床试验实施的特定障碍。
Trials. 2017 Sep 13;18(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2168-0.
5
Improving the Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Medical Devices.改进医疗设备经济评估方法
Health Econ. 2017 Feb;26 Suppl 1:70-92. doi: 10.1002/hec.3471.
6
Eliciting preferences for medical devices in South Korea: A discrete choice experiment.了解韩国对医疗设备的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Health Policy. 2017 Mar;121(3):243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.
8
Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences in health care.运用离散选择实验来了解医疗保健中的偏好。
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 2014;12:27-48. doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-5480-6_2.
9
Methods of international health technology assessment agencies for economic evaluations--a comparative analysis.国际卫生技术评估机构经济评价方法——比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 30;13:371. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-371.
10
Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.构建离散选择实验的实验设计:ISPOR 联合分析实验设计良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.