• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗患者对居家医疗保健和支持服务的偏好:中国的一项离散选择实验

Preference of primary care patients for home-based healthcare and support services: a discrete choice experiment in China.

作者信息

Liu Yaqing, Du Sixian, Liu Chaojie, Xue Tianqin, Tang Yuqing

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1324776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324776. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324776
PMID:38699415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11063295/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

This research, utilizing discrete choice experiments, examines the preferences and willingness to pay for home-based healthcare and support services among residents in China, a country grappling with severe aging population, an area often underexplored in international scholarship.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to solicit the preferences of primary care patients for home-based healthcare and support services in China.

DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted on 312 primary care patients recruited from 13 community health centers in Wuhan and Kunming between January and May 2023. The experimental choice sets were generated using NGene, covering five attributes: Scope of services, health professionals, institutions, insurance reimbursements, and visiting fees.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The choice sets were further divided into three blocks, and each participant was asked to complete one block containing 12 choice tasks. Mixed logit models were established to estimate the relevant importance coefficients of and willingness to pay for different choices, while Latent Class Logit (LCL) modeling was conducted to capture possible preferences heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The relevant importance of the scope of services reached 67.33%, compared with 19.84% for service institutions and 12.42% for health professionals. Overall, respondents preferred physician-led diagnostic and treatment services. LCL categorized the respondents into three groups: Group one (60.20%) was most concerned about the scope of services, prioritizing disease diagnosis and treatment over preventive care and mental health, while group two (16.60%) was most concerned about care providers (hospitals and medical doctors were preferred), and group three (23.20%) was most concerned about financial burdens.

CONCLUSION

Primary care patients prefer physical health and medical interventions for home-based healthcare and support services. However, heterogeneity in preferences is evident, indicating potential disparities in healthcare and support at home services in China.

摘要

重要性

本研究利用离散选择实验,考察了在中国这个正应对严重老龄化人口问题、且在国际学术研究中常被忽视的领域中,居民对居家医疗保健和支持服务的偏好及支付意愿。

目的

本研究旨在征求中国基层医疗患者对居家医疗保健和支持服务的偏好。

设计、地点和参与者:2023年1月至5月,对从武汉和昆明的13个社区卫生中心招募的312名基层医疗患者进行了离散选择实验。实验选择集使用NGene生成,涵盖五个属性:服务范围、医疗专业人员、机构、保险报销和出诊费用。

主要结果和测量指标

选择集进一步分为三个模块,要求每位参与者完成一个包含12个选择任务的模块。建立混合逻辑模型以估计不同选择的相关重要系数和支付意愿,同时进行潜在类别逻辑(LCL)建模以捕捉可能的偏好异质性。

结果

服务范围的相关重要性达到67.33%,而服务机构为19.84%,医疗专业人员为12.42%。总体而言,受访者更喜欢由医生主导的诊断和治疗服务。LCL将受访者分为三组:第一组(60.20%)最关注服务范围,将疾病诊断和治疗置于预防保健和心理健康之上;第二组(16.60%)最关注护理提供者(更喜欢医院和医生);第三组(23.20%)最关注经济负担。

结论

基层医疗患者在居家医疗保健和支持服务方面更喜欢身体健康和医疗干预。然而,偏好的异质性很明显,这表明中国居家医疗保健和支持服务可能存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e55f/11063295/cbb786f5f2ad/fpubh-12-1324776-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e55f/11063295/b8a5c412e538/fpubh-12-1324776-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e55f/11063295/cbb786f5f2ad/fpubh-12-1324776-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e55f/11063295/b8a5c412e538/fpubh-12-1324776-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e55f/11063295/cbb786f5f2ad/fpubh-12-1324776-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Preference of primary care patients for home-based healthcare and support services: a discrete choice experiment in China.基层医疗患者对居家医疗保健和支持服务的偏好:中国的一项离散选择实验
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1324776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324776. eCollection 2024.
2
Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.中国社区居民医疗服务利用的偏好异质性:一项陈述偏好离散选择实验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 18;20(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05134-4.
3
Preferences of patients with diabetes mellitus for primary healthcare institutions: a discrete choice experiment in China.糖尿病患者对基层医疗机构的偏好:中国的离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 27;13(6):e072495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072495.
4
Preferences of Patients with Non-Communicable Diseases for Primary Healthcare Facilities: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Wuhan, China.非传染性疾病患者对基层医疗保健设施的偏好:来自中国武汉的离散选择实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 4;17(11):3987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113987.
5
Older adults preferences for long-term caregivers in China: a discrete choice experiment.中国老年人对长期照护者的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Public Health. 2024 Jun;231:158-165. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.03.022. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
6
Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.中国 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,患者对人工智能应用与临床医生在疾病诊断中的偏好:离散选择实验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 23;23(2):e22841. doi: 10.2196/22841.
7
The choice and preference for public-private health care among urban residents in China: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.中国城市居民对公私医疗保健的选择与偏好:来自离散选择实验的证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1829-0.
8
Urban-rural differences in preferences for traditional Chinese medicine services among chronic disease patients: a discrete choice experiment.城乡慢性病患者对中医药服务偏好的差异:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04659-z.
9
Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.德国居家和社区长期护理服务偏好的离散选择实验研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Dec;19(9):1213-1223. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0968-0. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
10
Treatment Preferences of Residents Assumed to Have Severe Chronic Diseases in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.中国假设患有严重慢性病的居民的治疗偏好:离散选择实验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;17(22):8420. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228420.

引用本文的文献

1
The challenge of home and community older adult care in China: a survey of the capability of primary care physicians in providing geriatric healthcare services.中国居家与社区老年人护理面临的挑战:基层医疗医生提供老年医疗服务能力的调查
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 23;12:1464718. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1464718. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The future of cancer care in the UK-time for a radical and sustainable National Cancer Plan.英国癌症护理的未来——制定激进且可持续的国家癌症计划的时机已到。
Lancet Oncol. 2024 Jan;25(1):e6-e17. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00511-9. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Hospital at Home: An Evolving Model for Comprehensive Healthcare.居家医院:一种不断发展的综合医疗模式。
Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2021 Sep 14;4(4):141-146. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-21-4. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
Exploring barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of home rehabilitation care for older adults with disabilities using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
利用实施研究整合框架(CFIR)探索为残疾老年人实施家庭康复护理的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 13;23(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03976-1.
4
Developmental Gerontology and Active Population Aging in China.中国的发育老年学与积极人口老龄化
China CDC Wkly. 2023 Feb 24;5(8):184-187. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2023.033.
5
Patterns of home care and community support preferences among older adults with disabilities in China: a latent class analysis.中国失能老年人居家照护和社区支持偏好模式:一项潜在类别分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 3;23(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03830-4.
6
Association between types of home healthcare and emergency house calls, hospitalization, and end-of-life care in Japan.日本的家庭医疗保健类型与急诊家访、住院和临终关怀之间的关联。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jun;71(6):1795-1805. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18268. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
7
Weighing patient attributes in antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections: A discrete choice experiment on primary care physicians in Hubei Province, China.权衡上呼吸道感染抗生素处方中患者特征的重要性:基于中国湖北省基层医疗机构医生的离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 20;10:1008217. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1008217. eCollection 2022.
8
Cost-effectiveness of England's national 'Safe At Home' scheme for reducing hospital admissions for unintentional injury in children aged under 5.英格兰“居家安全”国家计划在减少5岁以下儿童意外伤害住院方面的成本效益。
Inj Prev. 2023 Apr;29(2):158-165. doi: 10.1136/ip-2022-044698. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
9
Impact of COVID-19 on Long-Term Care Service Utilization of Older Home-Dwelling Adults in Japan.COVID-19 对日本居家老年长期护理服务利用的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Feb;24(2):156-163.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.12.008. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
10
Managing the Transition From Hospital to Home After Stroke: A Patient and Care Partner Guide to Facilitate Discharge Planning.中风后从医院到家庭的过渡管理:患者及护理伙伴出院计划指南
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Jan;104(1):161-164. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.09.008. Epub 2022 Sep 29.