Cunha-Diniz Flávia, Taveira-Gomes Tiago, Teixeira José M, Magalhães Teresa
Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences Unit, Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Forensic Sci Res. 2023 Sep 22;8(3):219-229. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owad034. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Children represent a specific group of road traffic accident (RTA) victims. Performing a personal injury assessment (PIA) on a child presents a significant challenge, especially when assessing permanent disabilities and needs. However, medico-legal recommendations for PIA in such cases are lacking. The main objective of this study was to analyse the differences between children and a young- and middle-aged adult population of RTA victims to contribute to the development of relevant guidelines. Secondary objectives were to identify and characterize specifics of children's posttraumatic damages regarding: (i) temporary and permanent outcomes; and (ii) medico-legal damage parameters in the Portuguese context. We performed a retrospective study of RTA victims by comparing two groups ( = 114 each) matched for acute injury severity (SD = 0.01): G1 (children) and G2 (young- and middle-aged adults). Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios. G1 presented a greater chance of evolving without or with less severe , and outcomes (three-dimensional assessment methodology), and with lower permanent functional disability values than G2. Our findings suggest that childhood trauma generally has a better prognosis than trauma in young- and middle-aged adults. This study generated evidence on the subject and highlighted the most significant difficulties encountered by medico-legal experts when performing PIA in children.
This retrospective study of PIA in child victims of RTA in Portugal considered outcomes in victims' real-life situations.Several significant differences between children and young- and middle-aged adults were observed.Children's cases presented better results in terms of the severity of , and outcomes, and permanent damage parameters.The average time between the RTA and final PIA date and the consolidation time were longer for children because of the need to wait for the Children's next growth phase or final pubertal period (as applicable), which increased the time for PIA conclusion.There were several difficulties in the medical-legal evaluation of children's cases, which was a complex process because the trauma affected them in their growth phase.
儿童是道路交通事故(RTA)受害者中的一个特殊群体。对儿童进行人身伤害评估(PIA)面临重大挑战,尤其是在评估永久性残疾和需求时。然而,此类案件中PIA的法医学建议尚付阙如。本研究的主要目的是分析儿童与年轻及中年RTA受害者群体之间的差异,以促进相关指南的制定。次要目的是识别并描述儿童创伤后损害的具体情况,涉及:(i)临时和永久结果;以及(ii)葡萄牙背景下的法医学损害参数。我们通过比较两组(每组n = 114)急性损伤严重程度匹配(标准差 = 0.01)的RTA受害者进行了一项回顾性研究:G1(儿童)和G2(年轻及中年成年人)。采用逻辑回归估计比值比。与G2相比,G1在无或有较轻的[此处原文缺失具体内容]、[此处原文缺失具体内容]和[此处原文缺失具体内容]结果(三维评估方法)以及较低的永久性功能残疾值方面发展的可能性更大。我们的研究结果表明,儿童期创伤总体预后通常优于年轻及中年成年人的创伤。本研究为此主题提供了证据,并突出了法医学专家在对儿童进行PIA时遇到的最重大困难。
这项对葡萄牙RTA儿童受害者PIA的回顾性研究考虑了受害者现实生活中的结果。观察到儿童与年轻及中年成年人之间存在若干显著差异。儿童病例在[此处原文缺失具体内容]、[此处原文缺失具体内容]和[此处原文缺失具体内容]结果的严重程度以及永久性损害参数方面呈现出更好的结果。由于需要等待儿童的下一个生长阶段或最终青春期(如适用),RTA与最终PIA日期之间的平均时间以及愈合时间对儿童来说更长,这增加了PIA得出结论的时间。儿童病例的法医学评估存在若干困难,这是一个复杂的过程,因为创伤影响了他们的生长阶段。