灾难的辩证法:关于气候崩溃时代的灾害与脆弱性的思考,并以胡齐斯坦省为例进行简要分析

The dialectics of disaster: Considerations on hazards and vulnerability in the age of climate breakdown, with a brief case study of Khuzestan.

作者信息

Malm Andreas

机构信息

Human Ecology Division, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Jamba. 2023 Dec 26;15(1):1588. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v15i1.1588. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

In a historical moment inundated by disasters, understanding and conceptualising the phenomenon is a matter of some importance. No framework for doing so has been more productive than that developed by Wisner and his colleagues. But their so-called 'Progression of Vulnerability' (pressure and release [PAR] model) framework was conceived before the onset of the climate crisis. And that crisis, as the saying goes, changes everything.

CONTRIBUTION

What follows is an immanent critique of the framework, with an eye towards shifting some of its parameters in order to account for the process of climate breakdown now multiplying disasters across the globe.

摘要

未加标注

在一个被灾难淹没的历史时刻,理解并概念化这一现象具有一定重要性。在这方面,没有比威斯纳及其同事所提出的框架更具成效的了。但他们所谓的“脆弱性演变”(压力与释放[PAR]模型)框架是在气候危机出现之前构想出来的。而正如那句谚语所说,危机改变一切。

贡献

以下是对该框架的内在批判,旨在调整其部分参数,以便能够解释当前气候恶化致使全球灾害不断增加的这一过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61f6/10784277/53a03be78d8c/JAMBA-15-1588-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索