Dosimetric Comparison of Unmatched Flattening Filter-free and Flattened Beams in Volumetric Arc Therapy Plans for Head-and-neck Cancer.

INTRODUCTION

Conventionally, the fattened beam is being used in radiotherapy for routine clinical cases even after introduction of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with incorporation of multi-leaf collimator system. With the removal of the flattening filter (FF) from the beam's path average energy of the photon gets reduced resulting in reduced scatter, reduction in treatment time, and reduced neutron contamination for high-energy beam and ultimately resulting in treatment plan quality deviations. This study aims to investigate the usefulness of the FF-free (FFF) beam for routine head-and-neck cancer (HNC) cases treated with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) and dosimetrically compares the result with the FF beam.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 20 patients treated on Halcyon (unmatched 6 megavoltage [6MV] FFF beam) medical linear accelerator with VMAT of different HNC selected and for comparison with 6MV FF beam, 20 equivalent treatment plans are created for Truebeam configuration and the plans have been evaluated for target coverage, doses to the organ at risk (OAR), and other dose quality indices.

RESULTS

Comparable target coverage, doses to OARs except for rest right parotid ( = 0.02) between 6MV FFF beam and 6MV FF beam is observed. Insignificant differences in conformity index, homogeneity index, and gradient index have been observed. Higher monitor unit (MU) ( ≤ 0.001) and lesser beam on time (BOT) ( = 0.003) have been observed in 6MV FFF.

CONCLUSION

6MV FFF beam provides comparable target coverage and improved dose-sparing effect to most of the OARs. 6MV FFF beam has lesser BOT, but on the other hand number of MUs is higher as compared to 6MV-FF plans.