Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, California, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California, USA.
HLA. 2024 Jan;103(1):e15319. doi: 10.1111/tan.15319.
HLA genotyping was performed on 99 type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients and 200 controls from Mali. Next-generation sequencing of the classical HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DRB3, -DRB4, -DRB5, -DQA1, -DQB1, -DPA1, and -DPB1 loci revealed strong T1D association for all loci except HLA-C and -DPA1. Class II association is stronger than class I association, with most observed associations predisposing or protective as expected based on previous studies. For example, HLA-DRB103:01, HLA-DRB109:01, and HLA-DRB104:05 predispose for T1D, whereas HLA-DRB115:03 is protective. HLA-DPB104:02 (OR = 12.73, p = 2.92 × 10 ) and HLA-B27:05 (OR = 21.36, p = 3.72 × 10 ) appear highly predisposing, although previous studies involving multiple populations have reported HLA-DPB104:02 as T1D-protective and HLA-B27:05 as neutral. This result may reflect the linkage disequilibrium between alleles on the extended HLA-A24:02~HLA-B27:05HLA-C*02:02HLA-DRB104:05~HLA-DRB401:03HLA-DQB1*02:02HLA-DQA102:01~HLA-DPB104:02~HLA-DPA1*01:03 haplotype in this population rather than an effect of either allele itself. Individual amino acid (AA) analyses are consistent with most T1D association attributable to HLA class II rather than class I in this data set. AA-level analyses reveal previously undescribed differences of the HLA-C locus from the HLA-A and HLA-B loci, with more polymorphic positions, spanning a larger portion of the gene. This may reflect additional mechanisms for HLA-C to influence T1D risk, for example, through expression differences or through its role as the dominant ligand for killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR). Comparison of these data to those from larger studies and on other populations may facilitate T1D prediction and help elucidate elusive mechanisms of how HLA contributes to T1D risk and autoimmunity.
对来自马里的 99 名 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者和 200 名对照进行了 HLA 基因分型。对经典 HLA-A、-B、-C、-DRB1、-DRB3、-DRB4、-DRB5、-DQA1、-DQB1、-DPA1 和 -DPB1 基因座的下一代测序显示,除 HLA-C 和 -DPA1 外,所有基因座均与 T1D 强烈相关。与 I 类相比,II 类的关联更强,大多数观察到的关联都符合基于先前研究的预期,要么易患,要么保护。例如,HLA-DRB103:01、HLA-DRB109:01 和 HLA-DRB104:05 易患 T1D,而 HLA-DRB115:03 具有保护作用。HLA-DPB104:02(OR=12.73,p=2.92×10)和 HLA-B27:05(OR=21.36,p=3.72×10)似乎高度易患,尽管涉及多个人群的先前研究报告 HLA-DPB104:02 为 T1D 保护性,HLA-B27:05 为中性。这一结果可能反映了该人群中 HLA-A24:02~HLA-B27:05HLA-C*02:02HLA-DRB104:05~HLA-DRB401:03HLA-DQB1*02:02HLA-DQA102:01~HLA-DPB104:02~HLA-DPA1*01:03 扩展 HLA 单体型中等位基因之间的连锁不平衡,而不是单个等位基因本身的作用。该数据集的个体氨基酸(AA)分析与大多数 T1D 关联归因于 HLA II 类而不是 I 类一致。AA 水平分析揭示了 HLA-C 基因座与 HLA-A 和 HLA-B 基因座相比以前未描述的差异,具有更多多态性的位置,跨越基因的更大部分。这可能反映了 HLA-C 影响 T1D 风险的额外机制,例如通过表达差异或通过其作为杀伤细胞免疫球蛋白样受体(KIR)的主要配体的作用。将这些数据与更大规模的研究和其他人群的数据进行比较,可能有助于 T1D 的预测,并有助于阐明 HLA 如何导致 T1D 风险和自身免疫的难以捉摸的机制。