• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长效注射用抗精神病药物与口服抗精神病药物在预防精神科再住院方面的疗效比较

Efficacy of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Preventing Psychiatric Rehospitalizations.

作者信息

Thaman Pragya, Kulig Caitlin E, Greer Daniel

机构信息

From the Rutgers Pharmaceutical Fellowship Program.

Rutgers University Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Piscataway, NJ.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024;44(2):96-99. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001810. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1097/JCP.0000000000001810
PMID:38227617
Abstract

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is a chronic, debilitating mental illness that incurs a large economic burden. Decreasing hospital readmissions is a priority in health care to improve patient quality of life and decrease health care costs. Determining ways to prevent readmissions such as improving access to long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics is important to assess.

METHODS/PROCEDURES: A single-center retrospective review was conducted comparing readmission rates of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder discharged on LAI or oral antipsychotics between August 1, 2019, and June 30, 2022. The primary outcome was the 30-day psychiatric readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included chlorpromazine equivalent doses and use of anticholinergic medications.

FINDINGS/RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rate was 1.9% for the LAI antipsychotic group and 8.3% for the oral antipsychotic group ( P = 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-20.02). The average chlorpromazine equivalent antipsychotic dose of patients discharged on LAI versus oral antipsychotic medications was 477.3 and 278.6 mg/d, respectively ( P < 0.001). In addition, the prevalence of medications used to treat extrapyramidal symptom was 22.3% (n = 23) for the LAI antipsychotic group and 30.8% (n = 74) for the oral antipsychotic group ( P = 0.12). Sixty-four percent of LAI antipsychotics utilized were obtained from pharmaceutical company hospital inpatient free trial programs.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics showed a statistically significant reduction in 30-day rehospitalizations as compared with oral antipsychotics and hospital inpatient free trial programs aided in LAI antipsychotic acquisition.

摘要

目的/背景:精神分裂症是一种慢性、使人衰弱的精神疾病,会带来巨大的经济负担。减少医院再入院率是医疗保健的优先事项,以提高患者生活质量并降低医疗成本。确定预防再入院的方法,如改善长效注射用(LAI)抗精神病药物的可及性,对于评估至关重要。

方法/程序:进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,比较2019年8月1日至2022年6月30日期间使用LAI或口服抗精神病药物出院的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的再入院率。主要结局是30天精神科再入院率。次要结局包括氯丙嗪等效剂量和抗胆碱能药物的使用。

发现/结果:LAI抗精神病药物组的30天再入院率为1.9%,口服抗精神病药物组为8.3%(P = 0.03;95%置信区间,1.05 - 20.02)。使用LAI与口服抗精神病药物出院患者的平均氯丙嗪等效抗精神病药物剂量分别为477.3和278.6毫克/天(P < 0.001)。此外,LAI抗精神病药物组用于治疗锥体外系症状的药物患病率为22.3%(n = 23),口服抗精神病药物组为30.8%(n = 74)(P = 0.12)。所使用的LAI抗精神病药物中有64%是从制药公司医院住院患者免费试用项目获得的。

启示/结论:与口服抗精神病药物相比,长效注射用抗精神病药物在30天再住院率方面显示出统计学上的显著降低,并且医院住院患者免费试用项目有助于获得LAI抗精神病药物。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Preventing Psychiatric Rehospitalizations.长效注射用抗精神病药物与口服抗精神病药物在预防精神科再住院方面的疗效比较
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024;44(2):96-99. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001810. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
Antipsychotic Adherence and Rehospitalization in Schizophrenia Patients Receiving Oral Versus Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Following Hospital Discharge.精神分裂症患者出院后接受口服与长效注射抗精神病药物治疗的抗精神病药依从性和再入院情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Sep;21(9):754-68. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.9.754.
3
Do Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Prevent or Delay Hospital Readmission?长效注射用抗精神病药物能否预防或延迟再次入院?
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2018 Mar 13;48(3):8-15.
4
Letter to the Editor: Rethinking The Cost Of Antipsychotic Treatment: The Average Cost Of The Drugs Used In Turkey In 2020.给编辑的信:重新思考抗精神病药物治疗的成本:2020 年土耳其使用的药物的平均成本。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2022 Summer;33(2):146-148. doi: 10.5080/u26315.
5
Assessing the impact of long-acting injectable compared to oral antipsychotic medications on readmission to a state psychiatric hospital.评估长效注射用抗精神病药物与口服抗精神病药物相比对州立精神病医院再入院率的影响。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Dec;31(6):1155-1163. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13075. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
6
Real-world effectiveness of long-acting injectable antipsychotics to reduce 90-day and annual readmission in psychotic disorders: insights from a state psychiatric hospital.长效注射抗精神病药在减少精神病患者 90 天和年度再入院方面的真实世界效果:来自州立精神病医院的见解。
CNS Spectr. 2022 Oct;27(5):626-633. doi: 10.1017/S109285292100050X. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
Identifying Predictors of Primary Adherence to Second Generation Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Following Discharge from an Acute Inpatient Psychiatry Unit.确定急性住院精神科病房出院后第二代长效注射用抗精神病药物初次依从性的预测因素。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2019 Jun 20;49(2):8-16.
8
Prevalence of concomitant oral antipsychotic drug use among patients treated with long-acting, intramuscular, antipsychotic medications.使用长效肌内注射抗精神病药物治疗的患者中同时使用口服抗精神病药物的患病率。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jun;32(3):323-8. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31825244f6.
9
Readmissions, costs, and duration to subsequent outpatient visit after hospital discharge among Medicaid beneficiaries utilizing oral versus long-acting injectable antipsychotics in bipolar disorder or schizophrenia.在双相情感障碍或精神分裂症中,使用口服与长效注射抗精神病药物的医疗补助受益人的住院后再入院率、成本和后续门诊就诊持续时间。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Sep;38(9):1621-1630. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2101819. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
10
Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Schizophrenia Patients Treated with Long-Acting Injectable Versus Oral Antipsychotics.长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症患者的治疗模式、医疗资源利用和成本。
Adv Ther. 2018 Nov;35(11):1994-2014. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0786-x. Epub 2018 Sep 29.