Suppr超能文献

65岁及以上女性根尖脱垂手术后的纵向再次手术风险

Longitudinal Reoperation Risk After Apical Prolapse Procedures in Women Aged 65 Years and Older.

作者信息

Berger Alexander A, Bretschneider Carol E, Gregory W Thomas, Sung Vivian

机构信息

Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; and Women and Infants Hospital/Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar 1;143(3):411-418. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005511. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe longitudinal reoperation risk among older women undergoing surgery for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to compare risk of reoperation for prolapse and complications among different surgical approaches.

METHODS

This nationwide, retrospective cohort study evaluated older adult women (aged 65 years and older) within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) 5% LDS (Limited Data Set) who underwent sacrocolpopexy, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF), or colpocleisis, or their uterine-preserving equivalents, from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2018, with follow-up through 2019. The primary outcome was overall reoperation, and secondary outcomes included reoperation for POP and for complications. Rates were compared using χ 2 tests for categorical variables, Wilcoxon rank-sum for continuous variables and Kaplan Meier estimates of cumulative incidence. Death and exit from CMS insurance were considered as censoring events. We used cumulative incidence to calculate reoperation risk as a function of time at 1 year or more, 3 years or more, and 7 years or more.

RESULTS

This cohort included 4,089 women who underwent surgery to treat apical POP from 2011 to 2018: 1,034 underwent sacrocolpopexy, 717 underwent USLS, 1,529 underwent SSLF, and 809 underwent colpocleisis. Demographics varied among patients for each POP surgery. Patients who underwent the different surgeries had differences in age ( P <.01), Charlson Comorbidity Index score ( P <.01), diabetes ( P <.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( P <.01), hypertension ( P <.01), chronic pain ( P =.01), congestive heart failure ( P <.01), and concomitant hysterectomy ( P <.01). Reoperation rates were low and increased over time. The overall reoperation risk through 7 years was 7.3% for colpocleisis, 10.4% for USLS, 12.5% for sacrocolpopexy, and 15.0% for SSLF ( P <.01). Reoperation for recurrent POP through 7 years was 2.9% for colpocleisis, 7.3% for sacrocolpopexy, 7.7% for USLS, and 9.9% for SSLF ( P <.01). Reoperation for complications through 7 years was 5.3% for colpocleisis, 8.2% for sacrocolpopexy, 6.4% for USLS, and 8.2% for SSLF ( P <.01).

CONCLUSION

The type of surgical repair is significantly associated with long-term risk of reoperation. Colpocleisis offers the least likelihood of reoperation for prolapse, followed by sacrocolpopexy; colpocleisis followed by USLS has the least risk of long-term reoperation for complication.

摘要

目的

描述接受盆腔脏器顶端脱垂(POP)手术的老年女性再次手术的纵向风险,并比较不同手术方式下脱垂和并发症的再次手术风险。

方法

这项全国性的回顾性队列研究评估了医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)5%有限数据集内65岁及以上的老年女性,她们在2011年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间接受了骶骨阴道固定术、子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术(USLS)、骶棘韧带固定术(SSLF)或阴道封闭术,或保留子宫的等效手术,并随访至2019年。主要结局是总体再次手术,次要结局包括因POP和并发症进行的再次手术。分类变量采用χ²检验比较发生率,连续变量采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,累积发生率采用Kaplan-Meier估计。死亡和退出CMS保险被视为删失事件。我们使用累积发生率计算1年及以上、3年及以上和7年及以上时间的再次手术风险函数。

结果

该队列包括2011年至2018年接受顶端POP手术治疗的4089名女性:1034例接受骶骨阴道固定术,717例接受USLS,1529例接受SSLF,809例接受阴道封闭术。每种POP手术患者的人口统计学特征各不相同。接受不同手术的患者在年龄(P<.01)、Charlson合并症指数评分(P<.01)、糖尿病(P<.01)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(P<.01)、高血压(P<.01)、慢性疼痛(P=.01)、充血性心力衰竭(P<.01)和同期子宫切除术(P<.01)方面存在差异。再次手术率较低且随时间增加。7年时阴道封闭术的总体再次手术风险为7.3%,USLS为10.4%,骶骨阴道固定术为12.5%,SSLF为15.0%(P<.01)。7年时因复发性POP再次手术的比例,阴道封闭术为2.9%,骶骨阴道固定术为7.3%,USLS为7.7%,SSLF为9.9%(P<.01)。7年时因并发症再次手术的比例,阴道封闭术为5.3%,骶骨阴道固定术为8.2%,USLS为6.4%,SSLF为8.2%(P<.01)。

结论

手术修复类型与再次手术的长期风险显著相关。阴道封闭术脱垂再次手术的可能性最小,其次是骶骨阴道固定术;阴道封闭术联合USLS长期因并发症再次手术的风险最小。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Reoperation Risk After Apical Prolapse Procedures in Women Aged 65 Years and Older.
Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar 1;143(3):411-418. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005511. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
2
Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):306.e1-306.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.046. Epub 2022 May 30.
3
Sacrospinous fixation versus uterosacral ligament suspension in managing apical prolapse.
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 20;43(1):182. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05563-y.
4
Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):552.e1-552.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
5
Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jun;29(6):803-810. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3482-5. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
8
Vaginal vault prolapse and recurrent surgery: A nationwide observational cohort study.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 May;101(5):542-549. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14341. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
9
Outcomes of vaginal prolapse surgery among female Medicare beneficiaries: the role of apical support.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):981-987. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a8a5e4.

引用本文的文献

1
Very long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse repair.
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 13;19(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02185-1.
2
Surgical Decision-Making: Who Should Be Offered Sacrocolpopexy?
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Aug;35(8):1577-1580. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05877-2. Epub 2024 Jul 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验