Thongseesuksai Thaksaporn, Boonmars Thidarut, Laummaunwai Porntip
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Neglected Zoonosis and Vector-Borne Disease Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Jan 16;110(2):220-227. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0612. Print 2024 Feb 7.
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three DNA extraction methods: the GF-1 Blood DNA Extraction Kit (GF-1 BD Kit), which employs a spin column along with lysing and washing buffers; the tris-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and proteinase K (TE-pK) method, which utilizes a combination of TE buffer and proteinase K for cell lysis; and DNAzol® Direct (DN 131), a single reagent combined with heating for the extraction process. Plasmodium falciparum DNA was extracted from both whole blood and dried blook spots (DBSs), with consideration of DNA concentration, purity, cost, time requirement, and limit of parasite detection (LOD) for each method. The target gene in this study was 18S rRNA, resulting in a 395-bp product using specific primers. In the comparative analysis, the DN 131 method yielded significantly higher DNA quantities from whole blood and DBSs than the GF-1 BD Kit and TE-pK methods. In addition, the DNA purity obtained from whole blood and DBSs using the GF-1 BD Kit significantly exceeded that obtained using the TE-pK and DN 131 methods. For LOD, the whole blood extracted using the DN 131, GF-1 BD Kit, and TE-pK methods revealed 0.012, 0.012, and 1.6 parasites/µL, respectively. In the case of DBSs, the LODs for the DN 131, GF-1 BD Kit, and TE-pK methods were 1.6, 8, and 200 parasites/µL, respectively. The results revealed that the TE-pK method was the most cost-effective, whereas the DN 131 method showed the simplest protocol. These findings offer alternative approaches for extracting Plasmodium DNA that are particularly well-suited for large-scale studies conducted in resource-limited settings.
本研究旨在比较三种DNA提取方法的效果:GF-1血液DNA提取试剂盒(GF-1 BD试剂盒),该试剂盒采用离心柱以及裂解和洗涤缓冲液;三羟甲基氨基甲烷-乙二胺四乙酸和蛋白酶K(TE-pK)法,该方法利用TE缓冲液和蛋白酶K的组合进行细胞裂解;以及DNAzol® Direct(DN 131),一种结合加热用于提取过程的单一试剂。从全血和干血斑(DBS)中提取恶性疟原虫DNA,同时考虑每种方法的DNA浓度、纯度、成本、时间要求和寄生虫检测限(LOD)。本研究中的靶基因是18S rRNA,使用特异性引物扩增得到395 bp的产物。在比较分析中,DN 131方法从全血和DBS中获得的DNA量显著高于GF-1 BD试剂盒和TE-pK方法。此外,使用GF-1 BD试剂盒从全血和DBS中获得的DNA纯度显著高于使用TE-pK和DN 131方法获得的纯度。对于LOD,使用DN 131、GF-1 BD试剂盒和TE-pK方法提取的全血分别显示为0.012、0.012和1.6个寄生虫/µL。在DBS的情况下,DN 131、GF-1 BD试剂盒和TE-pK方法的LOD分别为1.6、8和200个寄生虫/µL。结果表明,TE-pK方法是最具成本效益的,而DN 131方法的操作流程最简单。这些发现为提取疟原虫DNA提供了替代方法,特别适用于在资源有限环境中进行的大规模研究。