Zhang Xuebin, Li Xuehong, Wang Ziyang, Liu Yue, Yao Litang
College of Geographic and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China.
Key Laboratory of Resource Environment and Sustainable Development of Oasis, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 16;14(1):1332. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51805-1.
To achieve the best management of the ecosystem and sustainable socioeconomic development, it is crucial to clarify the matching relationship between the supply and demand of ecosystem services (ESs). Four types of ESs were chosen for the Hexi region in this study: food supply, carbon sequestration, water yield, wind erosion control and sediment retention. We assessed the supply-demand and matching relationships of different ESs using the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Service and Tradeoffs (InVEST) model, the ESs supply-demand ratio and the four-quadrant model. Moreover, we also analyzed the supply-demand ratio of integrated ESs and their cold spots. The findings suggest that (1) from 2000 to 2020, the average supply of food supply, carbon sequestration, water yield, wind erosion control and sediment retention increased by 44.31 t/km, 128.44 t/hm, 14,545.94 m/km and 0.14 kg/m respectively, which showed a spatial pattern of "high in the southeast and low in the northwest". The average demand for food supply and carbon sequestration increased by 1.33 t/km and 0.32 t/hm respectively, while the average demand for water yield and wind erosion control and sediment retention decreased by 2997.25 m/km and 1.19 kg/km respectively. The spatial distribution is consistent with the layout of population density, production and residential areas, and fragile ecological areas. (2) The supply-demand ratio of food supply, carbon sequestration and water yield is greater than 0.095, which is in a state of oversupply, and the supply-demand ratio of wind erosion control and sediment retention is less than 0, which is in a state of shortage; all ESs are mainly in low-low spatial matching areas, mainly concentrated in the desert areas of the northwest in the Hexi region. (3) The supply-demand ratio of integrated ESs increased by 0.024, and the proportion of cold spots and sub-cold spots was more than 50% and concentrated in the northwest, while hot spots and sub-hot spots accounted for only about 16%, mainly distributed in the southern Qilian Mountains and some oasis areas.
为实现生态系统的最佳管理和社会经济的可持续发展,明确生态系统服务(ESs)供需之间的匹配关系至关重要。本研究选取了河西地区的四类生态系统服务:食物供给、碳固存、产水量、风蚀控制和泥沙滞留。我们使用生态系统服务综合价值评估与权衡(InVEST)模型、生态系统服务供需比和四象限模型评估了不同生态系统服务的供需及匹配关系。此外,我们还分析了综合生态系统服务的供需比及其冷点区域。研究结果表明:(1)2000年至2020年,食物供给、碳固存、产水量、风蚀控制和泥沙滞留的平均供给量分别增加了44.31吨/平方千米、128.44吨/公顷、14545.94米/平方千米和0.14千克/米,呈现出“东南高西北低”的空间格局。食物供给和碳固存的平均需求量分别增加了1.33吨/平方千米和0.32吨/公顷,而产水量、风蚀控制和泥沙滞留的平均需求量分别减少了2997.25米/平方千米和1.19千克/千米。其空间分布与人口密度、生产和居住区以及脆弱生态区的布局一致。(2)食物供给、碳固存和产水量的供需比大于0.09,表示处于供给过剩状态,风蚀控制和泥沙滞留的供需比小于0,表示处于短缺状态;所有生态系统服务主要处于低-低空间匹配区域,主要集中在河西地区西北部的沙漠地区。(3)综合生态系统服务的供需比增加了0.024,冷点和次冷点的比例超过50%且集中在西北部,而热点和次热点仅占约16%,主要分布在祁连山脉南部和一些绿洲地区。