State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 1;315:115158. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115158. Epub 2022 May 4.
Ecological security is the basis for ecosystems to provide various ecosystem services (ESs) to humans. Identifying ecological security patterns (ESPs) is an effective approach to determine the priority conservation areas and ensure regional ecological security. However, most previous studies on ESPs were based mainly on the supply of ESs, while the demand and sensitivity of ESs were not fully considered. In this study, a comprehensive ESP identification framework was developed by integrating the supply, demand and sensitivity of ESs with the fuzzy multicriteria decision-making and circuit theory. Taking the Yellow River Basin (YRB) as a case study, our results show that the ecological sources (139,633 km or 17.3%) of the YRB were located mainly in the transition area between the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and Loess Plateau, and in the Qinling Mountains and eastern plains; these areas reliably exhibited high conservation efficiency and low decision-making risk and tradeoff levels. However, the northern and western YRB had few ecological sources due to mismatches among the supply, demand and sensitivity of ESs. Based on circuit theory, ecological corridors (36,905 m and 76,878 km) effectively connected the western, southern and eastern parts of the YRB. These ecological sources and corridors were both dominated by grassland, forest and cropland. However, ten pinch points, primarily covered by cropland, were also recognized in the eastern YRB and should be considered as priority areas for ecological conservation. Moreover, our results indicate that this comprehensive ESP identification framework could provide useful guidance to decision-makers for maintaining ESs and ecological conservation.
生态安全是生态系统为人类提供各种生态系统服务(ESs)的基础。识别生态安全格局(ESPs)是确定优先保护区域和确保区域生态安全的有效方法。然而,以前大多数关于 ESPs 的研究主要基于 ESs 的供应,而没有充分考虑 ESs 的需求和敏感性。本研究通过将 ESs 的供应、需求和敏感性与模糊多准则决策和电路理论相结合,开发了一个综合的 ESP 识别框架。以黄河流域(YRB)为例,研究结果表明,YRB 的生态源(139633 公里或 17.3%)主要位于青藏高原和黄土高原的过渡区以及秦岭山脉和东部平原地区;这些地区可靠地表现出高保护效率和低决策风险和权衡水平。然而,由于 ESs 的供应、需求和敏感性之间不匹配,YRB 的北部和西部生态源较少。基于电路理论,生态走廊(36905 米和 76878 公里)有效地连接了 YRB 的西部、南部和东部。这些生态源和走廊主要由草地、森林和耕地组成。然而,在 YRB 的东部也识别出了十个压点,主要由耕地覆盖,应被视为生态保护的优先区域。此外,研究结果表明,这种综合的 ESP 识别框架可以为决策者提供有用的指导,以维持 ESs 和生态保护。