• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

被动抬腿试验对颅脑损伤患者颅内压和脑自动调节功能的影响:一项生理观察性研究。

The effect of passive leg raising test on intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation in brain injured patients: a physiological observational study.

机构信息

IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, via Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2024 Jan 16;28(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04785-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-023-04785-z
PMID:38229147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10790469/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of the passive leg raising (PLR) is limited in acute brain injury (ABI) patients with increased intracranial pressure (ICP) since the postural change of the head may impact on ICP and cerebral autoregulation. However, the PLR use may prevent a positive daily fluid balance, which had been recently associated to worse neurological outcomes. We therefore studied early and delayed effects of PLR on the cerebral autoregulation of patients recovering from ABI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a Prospective, observational, single-center study conducted in critically ill patients admitted with stable ABI and receiving invasive ICP monitoring, multimodal neuromonitoring and continuous hemodynamic monitoring. The fluid challenge consisted of 500 mL of crystalloid over 10 min; fluid responsiveness was defined as cardiac index increase ≥ 10%. Comparisons between different variables at baseline and after PLR were made by paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The correlation coefficients between hemodynamic and neuromonitoring variables were assessed using Spearman's rank test.

RESULTS

We studied 23 patients [12 patients (52.2%) were fluid responders]. The PLR significantly increased ICP [from 13.7 (8.3-16.4) to 15.4 (12.0-19.2) mmHg; p < 0.001], cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) [from 51.1 (47.4-55.6) to 56.4 (49.6-61.5) mmHg; p < 0.001] and the pressure reactivity index (PRx) [from 0.12 (0.01-0.24) to 0.43 (0.34-0.46) mmHg; p < 0.001]. Regarding Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived parameters, PLR significantly increased the arterial component of regional cerebral oxygen saturation (OHbi) [from 1.8 (0.8-3.7) to 4.3 (2.5-5.6) μM cm; p < 0.001], the deoxygenated hemoglobin (HHbi) [from 1.6 (0.2-2.9) to 2.7 (1.4-4.0) μM cm; p = 0.007] and total hemoglobin (cHbi) [from 3.6 (1.9-5.3) to 7.8 (5.2-10.3): p < 0.001]. In all the patients who had altered autoregulation after PLR, these changes persisted ten minutes afterwards. After the PLR, we observed a significant correlation between MAP and CPP and PRx.

CONCLUSIONS

In ABI patient with stable ICP, PLR test increased ICP, but mostly within safety values and thresholds. Despite this, cerebral autoregulation was importantly impaired, and this persisted up to 10 min after the end of the maneuvre. Our results discourage the use of PLR test in ABI even when ICP is stable.

摘要

背景

由于头部姿势的改变可能会影响颅内压(ICP)和脑自动调节,因此在颅内压升高的急性脑损伤(ABI)患者中,被动抬腿(PLR)的使用受到限制。然而,PLR 的使用可能会防止出现正的每日液体平衡,最近的研究表明这与更差的神经结局相关。因此,我们研究了 PLR 对从 ABI 中恢复的患者脑自动调节的早期和延迟影响。

材料和方法

这是一项前瞻性、观察性、单中心研究,在接受有创 ICP 监测、多模态神经监测和连续血流动力学监测的稳定 ABI 患者中进行。液体挑战由 500 毫升晶体液在 10 分钟内输注完成;血流动力学反应性定义为心指数增加≥10%。使用配对 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较基线和 PLR 后的不同变量。使用 Spearman 秩相关检验评估血流动力学和神经监测变量之间的相关系数。

结果

我们研究了 23 名患者[12 名患者(52.2%)为液体反应者]。PLR 显著增加了 ICP[从 13.7(8.3-16.4)mmHg 增加至 15.4(12.0-19.2)mmHg;p<0.001]、脑灌注压(CPP)[从 51.1(47.4-55.6)mmHg 增加至 56.4(49.6-61.5)mmHg;p<0.001]和压力反应性指数(PRx)[从 0.12(0.01-0.24)mmHg 增加至 0.43(0.34-0.46)mmHg;p<0.001]。关于近红外光谱(NIRS)衍生参数,PLR 显著增加了区域脑氧饱和度(OHbi)的动脉成分[从 1.8(0.8-3.7)μM·cm 增加至 4.3(2.5-5.6)μM·cm;p<0.001]、去氧血红蛋白(HHbi)[从 1.6(0.2-2.9)μM·cm 增加至 2.7(1.4-4.0)μM·cm;p=0.007]和总血红蛋白(cHbi)[从 3.6(1.9-5.3)μM·cm 增加至 7.8(5.2-10.3)μM·cm;p<0.001]。在所有 PLR 后自动调节发生改变的患者中,这些变化在 10 分钟后仍然存在。PLR 后,我们观察到 MAP 和 CPP 与 PRx 之间存在显著相关性。

结论

在颅内压稳定的 ABI 患者中,PLR 试验增加了 ICP,但大多仍在安全值和阈值范围内。尽管如此,脑自动调节仍受到严重损害,并且在操作结束后 10 分钟内仍然存在。我们的结果不鼓励在 ICP 稳定时使用 PLR 试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f89/10790469/71ff264d77eb/13054_2023_4785_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f89/10790469/4afc95b37cbe/13054_2023_4785_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f89/10790469/71ff264d77eb/13054_2023_4785_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f89/10790469/4afc95b37cbe/13054_2023_4785_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f89/10790469/71ff264d77eb/13054_2023_4785_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of passive leg raising test on intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation in brain injured patients: a physiological observational study.被动抬腿试验对颅脑损伤患者颅内压和脑自动调节功能的影响:一项生理观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Jan 16;28(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04785-z.
2
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
3
Short-term mild hyperventilation on intracranial pressure, cerebral autoregulation, and oxygenation in acute brain injury patients: a prospective observational study.急性颅脑损伤患者的颅内压、脑自动调节和氧合的短期轻度过度通气:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Aug;38(4):753-762. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01121-2. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
4
'Long' pressure reactivity index (L-PRx) as a measure of autoregulation correlates with outcome in traumatic brain injury patients.'长时'压力反应指数(L-PRx)作为自动调节的测量指标与创伤性脑损伤患者的预后相关。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Sep;154(9):1575-81. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1423-0. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
5
Effects of short-term hyperoxemia on cerebral autoregulation and tissue oxygenation in acute brain injured patients.短期高氧血症对急性脑损伤患者脑自动调节和组织氧合的影响。
Front Physiol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1113386. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1113386. eCollection 2023.
6
Passive leg raising in brain injury patients within the neurointensive care unit. A prospective trial.神经重症监护病房脑损伤患者的被动抬腿。一项前瞻性试验。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(3):200-206. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.108361.
7
Assessment of Optimal Arterial Pressure with Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.应用近红外光谱评估创伤性脑损伤患者的最佳动脉压。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2022;1395:133-137. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-14190-4_23.
8
A continuous correlation between intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity reflects cerebral autoregulation impairment during intracranial pressure plateau waves.颅内压与脑血流速度之间的持续相关性反映了颅内压平台波期间的脑自动调节功能受损。
Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21(3):514-25. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-9994-7.
9
Effects of Hyperthermia on Intracranial Pressure and Cerebral Autoregulation in Patients with an Acute Brain Injury.高热对急性颅脑损伤患者颅内压和脑自动调节功能的影响。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;131:71-74. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_15.
10
Noninvasive monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity with near infrared spectroscopy in head-injured patients.应用近红外光谱技术无创监测颅脑损伤患者脑血管反应性。
J Neurotrauma. 2010 Nov;27(11):1951-8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1388. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of Fluid Resuscitation Strategies in Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤中液体复苏策略的综合综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 5;14(17):6289. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176289.
2
Fluid management strategies in critically ill patients with ARDS: a narrative review.急性呼吸窘迫综合征危重症患者的液体管理策略:一篇叙述性综述
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 20;30(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02661-w.
3
Assessing fluid responsiveness by using functional hemodynamic tests in critically ill patients: a narrative review and a profile-based clinical guide.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on cerebral hemodynamics in acute brain injury patients.呼气末正压对急性脑损伤患者脑血流动力学的影响。
Front Physiol. 2023 May 2;14:1139658. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1139658. eCollection 2023.
2
Are We Ready for Clinical Therapy based on Cerebral Autoregulation? A Pro-con Debate.我们是否准备好开展基于脑自动调节的临床治疗?一场正反方辩论。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Oct;39(2):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01741-1. Epub 2023 May 10.
3
Pathophysiology of fluid administration in critically ill patients.
在危重症患者中使用功能性血流动力学测试评估液体反应性:一项叙述性综述及基于特征的临床指南
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Jan 20. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01255-x.
4
Feasibility of Fluid Responsiveness Assessment in Patients at Risk for Increased Intracranial Pressure.颅内压升高风险患者液体反应性评估的可行性
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 20;13(6):1786. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061786.
危重症患者液体输注的病理生理学
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2022 Nov 4;10(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40635-022-00473-4.
4
The prediction of fluid responsiveness.液体反应性的预测。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jan;49(1):83-86. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06900-0. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Hemodynamic management of acute brain injury caused by cerebrovascular diseases: a survey of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.脑血管疾病所致急性脑损伤的血流动力学管理:欧洲重症监护医学学会的一项调查
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2022 Sep 12;10(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40635-022-00463-6.
6
Effective hemodynamic monitoring.有效的血流动力学监测。
Crit Care. 2022 Sep 28;26(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04173-z.
7
How can assessing hemodynamics help to assess volume status?评估血流动力学如何帮助评估血容量状态?
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Oct;48(10):1482-1494. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06808-9. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
8
Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades.危重症患者血流动力学监测时的液体治疗挑战:二十年的系统回顾和比较。
Crit Care. 2022 Jun 21;26(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04056-3.
9
2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.2022年自发性脑出血患者管理指南:美国心脏协会/美国中风协会指南
Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):e282-e361. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000407. Epub 2022 May 17.
10
Passive leg raising in brain injury patients within the neurointensive care unit. A prospective trial.神经重症监护病房脑损伤患者的被动抬腿。一项前瞻性试验。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(3):200-206. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.108361.