Vasquez-Hidalgo Manuel A, Mellencamp Martha, Amodie Deborah, Bohrer Benjamin M, VanDeWeyer Leanne, Vonnahme Kimberly A
Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USA.
Zoetis, Inc., Parsippany, NJ 07054, USA.
Transl Anim Sci. 2023 Dec 23;8:txad144. doi: 10.1093/tas/txad144. eCollection 2024.
The objective was to evaluate the effects of Improvest on the performance and carcass characteristics of gilts from two different genetic sire lines and the performance of Improvest gilts with castrated male pigs. It was hypothesized that performance parameters observed for Improvest gilts would be similar to barrows, thus narrowing the performance gaps between traditionally managed gilts and barrows. Pigs were from Large White/Landrace dams and either Duroc-Pietrain () or Duroc () sires. Females within each genetic sire line were randomized by weight to receive the first dose of Improvest () on day 25 of the study or to serve as a nontreated control (DP IMP gilt ( = 6 pens; 19 pigs/pen), D IMP gilt ( = 6 pens; 19 pigs/pen), DP CON gilt ( = 6 pens; 19 pigs/pen), D CON gilt ( = 6 pens; 19 pigs/pen). The second dose of Improvest was administered 6 wk later (i.e., day 67). Barrows did not receive Improvest (DP barrow [ = 10 pens; 19 to 20 pigs/pen], D barrow [ = 10 pens; 19 to 20 pigs/pen]). Average daily gain (), average daily feed intake (), and gain-to-feed ratio () were measured at 21 d intervals throughout the duration of the study. The targeted weight for pigs to be marketed was 133 ± 2.5 kg. Carcass characteristics and loin quality parameters were evaluated on a subset of pigs ( = 283). Improvest-treated gilts of both genetic lines had increased ( ≤ 0.05) ADG and ADFI compared to untreated gilts during the post-second dose intervals with values exceeding that of barrows from day 84 to marketing. Overall, DP IMP gilts had increased ( ≤ 0.05) G:F post-second dose compared to DP CON gilts and DP barrows, yet all other treatments were similar. As pigs were marketed at a similar weight, there was no difference in the final weight, however, DP IMP gilts and DP barrows reached market weight sooner ( ≤ 0.05) than DP CON gilts (109.9 and 111.8 vs. 114.3 ± 0.8 d). Backfat and loin weight were greater ( < 0.01) in IMP gilts versus CON gilts, while IMP gilts and barrows had similar values within each respective genetic sire line. There were no differences between treatments ( ≥ 0.08) for pH and instrumental color of the loins. When the pass rate of loins (Japanese color score ≥ 3.0 and marbling ≥ 2.0) was evaluated, IMP gilts were at intermediate values between CON gilts and barrows for each respective genetic sire line. Overall, Improvest within a genetic line improved gilt carcass measurements so that they were more similar to barrows.
目的是评估“英普罗韦斯特”(Improvest)对来自两个不同遗传父系品系的后备母猪生产性能和胴体特性的影响,以及“英普罗韦斯特”后备母猪与去势公猪的生产性能。研究假设是,观察到的“英普罗韦斯特”后备母猪的生产性能参数将与阉猪相似,从而缩小传统管理的后备母猪与阉猪之间的生产性能差距。猪来自大白猪/长白猪母猪与杜洛克 - 皮特兰猪()或杜洛克猪()公猪的杂交后代。每个遗传父系品系内的母猪按体重随机分组,在研究的第25天接受第一剂“英普罗韦斯特”()或作为未处理对照(DP IMP后备母猪( = 6栏;每栏19头猪),D IMP后备母猪( = 6栏;每栏19头猪),DP CON后备母猪( = 6栏;每栏19头猪),D CON后备母猪( = 6栏;每栏19头猪))。6周后(即第67天)给予第二剂“英普罗韦斯特”。阉猪不接受“英普罗韦斯特”(DP阉猪[ = 10栏;每栏19至20头猪],D阉猪[ = 10栏;每栏19至20头猪])。在整个研究期间,每隔21天测量平均日增重()、平均日采食量()和料重比()。上市猪的目标体重为133 ± 2.5千克。对一部分猪( = 283头)评估胴体特性和腰肉品质参数。与未处理的后备母猪相比,两个遗传品系经“英普罗韦斯特”处理的后备母猪在第二次给药后的间隔期内平均日增重和平均日采食量增加( ≤ 0.05),从第84天到上市时其值超过阉猪。总体而言,与DP CON后备母猪和DP阉猪相比,DP IMP后备母猪在第二次给药后的料重比增加( ≤ 0.05),但所有其他处理组相似。由于猪以相似体重上市,最终体重没有差异,然而,DP IMP后备母猪和DP阉猪比DP CON后备母猪更快达到上市体重( ≤ 0.05)(109.9天和111.8天对114.3 ± 0.8天)。与CON后备母猪相比,IMP后备母猪的背膘厚和腰肉重更大( < 0.01),而在每个遗传父系品系内,IMP后备母猪和阉猪的值相似。对于腰肉的pH值和仪器颜色,各处理组之间没有差异( ≥ 0.08)。当评估腰肉的合格率(日本颜色评分 ≥ 3.0且大理石纹 ≥ 2.0)时,在每个遗传父系品系中,IMP后备母猪的值介于CON后备母猪和阉猪之间。总体而言,一个遗传品系内的“英普罗韦斯特”改善了后备母猪的胴体测量值,使其更接近阉猪。