Secondary cytoreductive surgery with and without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND

Secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) can afford promising results in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer; however, the impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains unclear. We compared the outcomes of secondary CRS combined with and without HIPEC in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who underwent secondary CRS, with or without HIPEC (n=46), at the Yonsei Cancer Center between January 2006 and February 2021. Of the 46 included patients, 20 underwent secondary CRS-plus-HIPEC, while 26 underwent secondary CRS without HIPEC (henceforth referred to as secondary CRS-only).

RESULTS

Of the 46 patients, 84.8% and 89.1% had undergone optimal surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy, respectively, as the initial treatment before the first relapse. Overall, 32.6% of patients received maintenance therapy, such as bevacizumab or polyadenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors. The median follow-up period was 15.9 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 32.7 and 25.1 months in the secondary CRS-plus-HIPEC and secondary CRS-only groups, respectively; however, both groups failed to reach the median overall survival (OS). Based on the Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no difference in PFS (P=0.587) or OS (P=0.239) between the two groups. We identified patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and found that the median PFS was 25.1 months in the secondary CRS-only group; this was not achieved in the secondary CRS-plus-HIPEC group (P=0.244).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, secondary CRS with HIPEC did not improve survival when compared with CRS without HIPEC. However, on subgrouping patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, the addition of HIPEC to secondary CRS tended to improve PFS.