Shippee Nathan D, Danan Elisheva R, Linzer Mark, Parsons Helen M, Beebe Timothy J, Enders Felicity T
Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
VA HSR&D Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 31;7(1):e248. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.667. eCollection 2023.
This paper outlines the development, deployment and use, and testing of a tool for measuring and improving healthcare researcher embeddedness - i.e., being connected to and engaged with key leverage points and stakeholders in a health system. Despite the widely acknowledged importance of embeddedness for learning health systems and late-stage translational research, we were not aware of useful tools for addressing and improving embeddedness in scholar training programs. We developed the MN-LHS Embeddedness Tool covering connections to committees, working groups, leadership, and other points of contact across four domains: patients and caregivers; local practice (e.g., operations and workflows); local institutional research (e.g., research committees and agenda- or initiative-setting groups); and national (strategic connections within professional groups, conferences, etc.). We used qualitative patterns and narrative findings from 11 learning health system training program scholars to explore variation in scholar trajectories and the embeddedness tool's usefulness in scholar professional development. Tool characteristics showed moderate evidence of construct validity; secondarily, we found significant differences in embeddedness, as a score, from baseline through program completion. The tool has demonstrated simple, practical utility in making embeddedness an explicit (rather than hidden) part of applied and learning health system researcher training, alongside emerging evidence for validity.
本文概述了一种用于衡量和改善医疗保健研究人员融入度的工具的开发、部署与使用以及测试情况。所谓融入度,即与卫生系统中的关键杠杆点及利益相关者建立联系并积极参与其中。尽管人们普遍认识到融入度对于学习型卫生系统和后期转化研究的重要性,但我们并未发现有实用工具可用于解决和改善学者培训项目中的融入度问题。我们开发了MN-LHS融入度工具,该工具涵盖了与委员会、工作组、领导层以及四个领域中其他接触点的联系:患者和护理人员;当地实践(如运营和工作流程);当地机构研究(如研究委员会以及议程或倡议制定小组);以及国家层面(专业团体、会议等内部的战略联系)。我们利用11位学习型卫生系统培训项目学者的定性模式和叙述性研究结果,来探索学者轨迹的差异以及融入度工具在学者职业发展中的实用性。工具特性显示出适度的结构效度证据;其次,我们发现从基线到项目结束,作为分数的融入度存在显著差异。该工具已证明在使融入度成为应用和学习型卫生系统研究人员培训中明确(而非隐性)的一部分方面具有简单、实用的效用,同时也有新出现的效度证据。