开发一种学习健康系统科学能力评估方法以指导培训和能力评估。
Development of a learning health system science competency assessment to guide training and proficiency assessment.
作者信息
Franklin Patricia D, Drane Denise, Wakschlag Lauren, Ackerman Ronald, Kho Abel, Cella David
机构信息
Department of Medical Social Sciences Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago Illinois USA.
Program Evaluation Core & Searle Center for Advancing Learning and Teaching Northwestern University Evanston Illinois USA.
出版信息
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Oct 14;6(4):e10343. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10343. eCollection 2022 Oct.
INTRODUCTION
Learning health systems (LHS) science is fundamentally a transdisciplinary field. To capture the breadth of the competencies of an LHS scientist, AHRQ and national experts defined a series of 42 competencies across seven domains that support success. Clinicians, researchers, and leaders who are new to the LHS field can identify and prioritize proficiency development among these domains. In addition, existing leaders and researchers will assemble teams of experts who together represent the LHS science domains. To serve LHS workforce development and proficiency assessment, the AHRQ-funded ACCELERAT K12 training program recruited domain experts and trainees to define and operationalize items to include in an LHS Competency Assessment to support emerging and existing LHS scientists in prioritizing and monitoring proficiency development.
METHODS
Sequential interviews with 18 experts iteratively defined skills and tasks to illustrate stage in proficiency, and its progression, for each of 42 competencies in the seven LHS expertise domains: systems science; research questions and standards of scientific evidence; research methods; informatics; ethics of research and implementation in health systems; improvement and implementation science; and engagement, leadership, and research management. An educational assessment expert and LHS scientist refined the assessment criteria at each stage to use parallel language across domains. Last, current trainees reviewed and pilot tested the assessment and the LHS Competency Assessment was further refined using their feedback. The assessment framework was informed by Bloom's revised taxonomy of educational objectives (Anderson and Krathwohl, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, 2001) where learning progresses from recalling, defining, understanding, and awareness at the lower levels of the taxonomy, to applying and adopting and finally to creating, designing, and critiquing at the upper levels of the taxonomy. We also developed assessment criteria that could be used for longer term assessment of direct performance. Van der Vleuten et al. (Best Pract Res Clin Obstetr Gynaecol. 2010;24(6):703-719) define longer term direct assessment methods as assessment that occurs over a period ranging from weeks to even years and involves multiple assessment methods and exposure to the learner's work over an extended period.
RESULTS
This experience report describes the content of the LHS Competency Assessment. For each domain and competency, the assessment lists examples of evidence to support expertise at each level of proficiency: no exposure; foundational (awareness/understanding); emerging (early application); and proficient (application with a high level of skill). Trainees begin with baseline standard assessment tables, where they can indicate no exposure or mark the foundational and emerging skills with which they have competence. For domains where foundational and emerging skills have been achieved, users can move on to assessment tables that list evidence of proficiency.
CONCLUSION
The LHS Competency Assessment offers consistent, graded criteria across the seven LHS domains to guide trainees and mentors to evaluate progress from no experience to foundational knowledge, emerging proficiency, and proficiency. The assessment can also be used to design training and mentoring for those newly exposed to LHS science and for those with key expertise who wish to expand LHS expertise.
引言
学习型健康系统(LHS)科学从根本上来说是一个跨学科领域。为了涵盖LHS科学家能力的广度,美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)和国家专家在七个领域定义了一系列42项能力,以支持取得成功。刚接触LHS领域的临床医生、研究人员和领导者可以在这些领域中确定能力发展的重点并进行优先级排序。此外,现有的领导者和研究人员将组建由专家组成的团队,这些专家共同代表LHS科学领域。为了服务于LHS劳动力发展和能力评估,由AHRQ资助的ACCELERAT K12培训项目招募了领域专家和学员,以定义并实施纳入LHS能力评估的项目,以支持新兴和现有的LHS科学家确定能力发展的优先级并监测其进展情况。
方法
对18位专家进行系列访谈,反复定义技能和任务,以说明LHS七个专业领域中42项能力各自的熟练程度阶段及其进展情况,这七个领域分别是:系统科学;研究问题和科学证据标准;研究方法;信息学;卫生系统研究与实施的伦理;改进与实施科学;以及参与、领导力和研究管理。一位教育评估专家和LHS科学家在每个阶段完善评估标准,以便在各领域使用一致的表述。最后,当前的学员对评估进行了审查和试点测试,并根据他们的反馈对LHS能力评估进行了进一步完善。评估框架以布鲁姆修订的教育目标分类法(安德森和克拉斯沃尔,《学习、教学和评估的分类法:布鲁姆教育目标分类法的修订》,2001年)为依据,其中学习从分类法较低层次的回忆、定义、理解和知晓,发展到应用和采用,最后在分类法较高层次进行创造、设计和批判。我们还制定了可用于对直接表现进行长期评估的评估标准。范德弗勒滕等人(《最佳实践研究:临床产科学与妇科学》。2010年;24(6):703 - 719)将长期直接评估方法定义为在从数周甚至数年的时间段内进行的评估,涉及多种评估方法,并在较长时期内接触学习者的工作。
结果
本经验报告描述了LHS能力评估的内容。对于每个领域和能力,评估列出了支持各熟练程度水平专业能力的证据示例:无接触;基础(知晓/理解);新兴(早期应用);以及熟练(高水平技能应用)。学员从基线标准评估表开始,在表中他们可以表明无接触情况或标记出自己具备能力的基础和新兴技能。对于已达到基础和新兴技能的领域,用户可以继续使用列出熟练程度证据的评估表。
结论
LHS能力评估在LHS的七个领域提供了一致的分级标准,以指导学员和导师评估从无经验到基础知识、新兴熟练程度和熟练程度的进展情况。该评估还可用于为新接触LHS科学的人员以及希望扩展LHS专业知识的关键专业人员设计培训和指导。
相似文献
Learn Health Syst. 2022-10-14
Learn Health Syst. 2023-7-31
Health Serv Res. 2017-8-4
Learn Health Syst. 2022-7-24
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Learn Health Syst. 2021-11-18
引用本文的文献
Learn Health Syst. 2024-1-16
Learn Health Syst. 2023-7-31
本文引用的文献
Am J Epidemiol. 2020-10-1
ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2019-5-2
Health Serv Res. 2018-3-13
Med Educ. 2017-10-27
Health Serv Res. 2017-8-4
Gastroenterology. 2015-1
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014-8-26
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014-1-20
Mil Med. 2013-5