• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进公平、包容与效率:一种采用团队科学方法为多学科研究团队制定作者署名指南的方式。

Promoting equity, inclusion, and efficiency: A team science approach to the development of authorship guidelines for a multi-disciplinary research team.

作者信息

Lewis Hannah, Biesecker Barbara, Lee Sandra Soo-Jin, Anderson Katherine, Joseph Galen, Jenkins Charisma L, Bulkley Joanna E, Leo Michael C, Goddard Katrina A B, Wilfond Benjamin S

机构信息

Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 30;7(1):e265. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.685. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2023.685
PMID:38229898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10790100/
Abstract

Large research teams and consortia present challenges for authorship. The number of disciplines involved in the research can further complicate approaches to manuscript development and leadership. The CHARM team, representing a multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional genomics implementation study, participated in facilitated discussions inspired by team science methodologies. The discussions were centered on team members' past experiences with authorship and perspectives on authorship in a large research team context. Team members identified challenges and opportunities that were used to create guidelines and administrative tools to support manuscript development. The guidelines were organized by the three values of equity, inclusion, and efficiency and included eight principles. A visual dashboard was created to allow all team members to see who was leading or involved in each paper. Additional tools to promote equity, inclusion, and efficiency included providing standardized project management for each manuscript and making "concept sheets" for each manuscript accessible to all team members. The process used in CHARM can be used by other large research teams and consortia to equitably distribute lead authorship opportunities, foster coauthor inclusion, and efficiently work with large authorship groups.

摘要

大型研究团队和联盟在作者身份认定方面存在挑战。研究涉及的学科数量会使稿件撰写方法和领导方式进一步复杂化。CHARM团队代表一项多学科、多机构的基因组学实施研究,参与了受团队科学方法启发而开展的促进性讨论。这些讨论围绕团队成员过去在作者身份认定方面的经历以及在大型研究团队背景下对作者身份认定的看法展开。团队成员识别出了一些挑战和机遇,这些被用于制定支持稿件撰写的指南和管理工具。这些指南按照公平、包容和效率这三个价值观进行组织,包含八项原则。创建了一个可视化仪表板,以便所有团队成员了解每篇论文的负责人或参与人员。促进公平、包容和效率的其他工具包括为每篇稿件提供标准化项目管理,以及让所有团队成员都能获取每篇稿件的“概念表”。CHARM所采用的流程可供其他大型研究团队和联盟使用,以公平分配第一作者机会、促进共同作者参与,并高效地与大型作者群体合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8742/10790100/926583b75b08/S2059866123006854_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8742/10790100/926583b75b08/S2059866123006854_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8742/10790100/926583b75b08/S2059866123006854_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Promoting equity, inclusion, and efficiency: A team science approach to the development of authorship guidelines for a multi-disciplinary research team.促进公平、包容与效率:一种采用团队科学方法为多学科研究团队制定作者署名指南的方式。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 30;7(1):e265. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.685. eCollection 2023.
2
A policy toolkit for authorship and dissemination policies may benefit NIH research consortia.一个针对作者身份和发表政策的政策工具包可能会使 NIH 研究联盟受益。
Account Res. 2024 Dec;31(3):222-240. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2116318. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
3
Managing opportunities and challenges of co-authorship.应对共同署名的机遇与挑战。
West J Nurs Res. 2015 Feb;37(2):134-63. doi: 10.1177/0193945914532722. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
4
Engaging with patients in research on knowledge translation/implementation science methods: a self study.让患者参与知识转化/实施科学方法的研究:一项自我研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 8;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00375-5.
5
Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective.科学手稿中的多位作者:伦理挑战、幽灵作者与客座/赠礼作者以及文化/学科视角
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Oct;22(5):1457-1472. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
6
Developing catalyst films of health experiences: an analysis of a robust multi-stakeholder involvement journey.开发健康体验的催化剂薄膜:对一个稳健的多利益相关者参与过程的分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jul 29;8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00369-3.
7
How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations.如何构建大型团队科学:大规模合作实用指南
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jun 7;10(6):230235. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230235. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Group authorship, an excellent opportunity laced with ethical, legal and technical challenges.团体署名,是一个充满伦理、法律和技术挑战的绝佳机会。
Account Res. 2024 Mar 6:1-23. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2322557.
9
Team Science: Advancing Women and Black, Indigenous, and other People of Color on the Pathway of Conducting Clinical Research.团队科学:助力女性以及黑人、原住民和其他有色人种走上临床研究之路。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 21;10:20499361231159501. doi: 10.1177/20499361231159501. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
Operationalization, implementation, and evaluation of Collaboration Planning: A pilot interventional study of nascent translational teams.协作规划的实施、执行与评估:对新兴转化团队的一项试点干预研究
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul 24;5(1):e23. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.515.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical and academic dilemmas in authorship of clinical research publications: a medical oncologist's perspective.临床研究出版物作者身份中的伦理与学术困境:一位医学肿瘤学家的视角
Med Oncol. 2025 Feb 11;42(3):74. doi: 10.1007/s12032-025-02617-4.

本文引用的文献

1
: Scaffolded training for research self-efficacy, interdisciplinarity, diversity, equity, and inclusive excellence in biomedical research.针对生物医学研究中的研究自我效能、跨学科性、多样性、公平性和包容性卓越性的支架式培训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul 22;5(1):e195. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.810. eCollection 2021.
2
Diversity, equity, and inclusion in academia to guide society.学术界的多样性、公平性和包容性指导社会。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2022 Jan;37(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.10.010. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
3
Equity for excellence in academic institutions: a manifesto for change.
学术机构追求卓越的公平性:变革宣言。
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Jun 7;6:142. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16861.1. eCollection 2021.
4
Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations.癌症健康评估惠及众人(CHARM):一项评估多种癌症遗传学服务提供模式及其对不同人群影响的临床试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106432. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106432. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
Researchers' Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams.研究人员对合作研究团队中伦理作者署名分配的看法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):1995-2022. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
6
The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations.临床测序证据生成研究联盟:在不同和医疗资源不足的人群中整合基因组测序。
Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Sep 6;103(3):319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007.
7
Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications.多学科/跨学科健康科学研究出版物中作者排序的最佳实践。
Account Res. 2017;24(4):243-267. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
8
Trouble in Paradise: Problems in Academic Research Co-authoring.学术合作中的问题:学术研究合著中的麻烦
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1717-1743. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
9
[Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals].[关于医学期刊中学术作品的撰写、报告、编辑及发表的建议]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;22(10):781-91.
10
Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement.写作受阻:论研究共同署名的问题及一些可能的改进策略。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1315-29. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9606-0. Epub 2014 Oct 28.