Hamer Mika K, Sobczak Chelsea, Whittington Lindsey, Bowyer Rachel L, Koren Ramona, Begay Joel A, Lum Hillary D, Ginde Adit A, Wynia Matthew K, Kwan Bethany M
Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 13;7(1):e258. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.679. eCollection 2023.
Multi-level dissemination strategies are needed to increase equitable access to effective treatment for high-risk outpatients with COVID-19, particularly among patients from disproportionately affected communities. Yet assessing population-level impact of such strategies can be challenging.
In collaboration with key contributors in Colorado, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate a multi-level dissemination strategy for neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment. Real-world data included county-level, de-identified output from a statewide mAb referral registry linked with publicly available epidemiological data. Outcomes included weekly number of mAb referrals, unique referring clinicians, and COVID-19 hospitalization rates. We assessed weekly changes in outcomes after dissemination strategies launched in July 2021.
Overall, mAb referrals increased from a weekly average of 3.0 to 15.5, with an increase of 1.3 to 42.1 additional referrals per county in each post-period week ( < .05). Number of referring clinicians increased from a weekly average of 2.2 to 9.7, with an additional 1.5 to 22.2 unique referring clinicians observed per county per week beginning 5 weeks post-launch ( < .001). Larger effects were observed in communities specifically prioritized by the dissemination strategies. There were no observed differences in COVID-19 hospitalization rates between counties with and without mAb treatment sites.
Real-world data can be used to estimate population impact of multi-level dissemination strategies. The launch of these strategies corresponded with increases in mAb referrals, but no apparent population-level effects on hospitalization outcomes. Strengths of this analytic approach include pragmatism and efficiency, whereas limitations include inability to control for other contemporaneous trends.
需要采取多层次传播策略,以增加高危COVID-19门诊患者获得有效治疗的公平机会,特别是在受影响不成比例的社区的患者中。然而,评估此类策略对人群的影响可能具有挑战性。
我们与科罗拉多州的主要贡献者合作,进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以评估用于中和单克隆抗体(mAb)治疗的多层次传播策略。真实世界的数据包括县级、来自全州mAb转诊登记处的去识别化输出,并与公开可用的流行病学数据相关联。结果包括每周mAb转诊数量、独特的转诊临床医生数量以及COVID-19住院率。我们评估了2021年7月启动传播策略后结果的每周变化。
总体而言,mAb转诊量从每周平均3.0增加到15.5,在每个后期周,每个县的额外转诊量增加了1.3至42.1(P<0.05)。转诊临床医生数量从每周平均2.2增加到9.7,自发布后5周起,每个县每周观察到额外1.5至22.2名独特的转诊临床医生(P<0.001)。在传播策略特别优先考虑的社区中观察到了更大的效果。有mAb治疗点的县和没有mAb治疗点的县之间,COVID-19住院率没有观察到差异。
真实世界的数据可用于估计多层次传播策略对人群的影响。这些策略的推出与mAb转诊量的增加相对应,但对住院结果没有明显的人群水平影响。这种分析方法的优点包括务实性和效率,而局限性包括无法控制其他同期趋势。