Fang Likui, Yu Wenfeng, Yu Guocan, Chen Gang, Ye Bo
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Jan 12;17:131-139. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S445025. eCollection 2024.
Tuberculous constrictive pericarditis (TCP) is recommended to be treated with anti-tuberculosis (TB) therapy before pericardiectomy. Whether different preoperative anti-TB regimens may lead to different outcomes is unclear.
We retrospectively collected patients diagnosed as TCP and received pericardiectomy from April 2016 to June 2023. The study patients were assigned into the active TCP (A-TCP) group and the inactive TCP (IA-TCP) group according to the results of (MTB) culture and MTB RNA assay. Baseline characteristics including anti-TB regimens and surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to identify the protective factors of A-TCP.
Of the 102 study patients, 24 was in the A-TCP group and 78 was in the IA-TCP group. The rate of preoperative anti-TB regimen containing pyrazinamide was 37.5% in the A-TCP group, as compared with 74.4% in the IA-TCP group (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative use of pyrazinamide was the protective factor of A-TCP (OR 0.194, 95% CI 0.053-0.703, P = 0.013). Subgroup analysis based on age also showed consistent findings. In the analyses of surgical outcomes, A-TCP was the independent risk factor of postoperative cardiac complications (OR 4.231, 95% CI 1.317-13.593, P = 0.015) and associated with longer hospital stay (P = 0.004) and higher hospitalization cost (P = 0.001).
A strategy involving anti-TB regimen containing pyrazinamide before pericardiectomy was superior to that without pyrazinamide in the patients with TCP. The strategy was associated with lower risk of A-TCP and might lead to better postoperative recovery and cost-effectiveness.
结核性缩窄性心包炎(TCP)建议在心包切除术前行抗结核(TB)治疗。术前不同的抗结核方案是否会导致不同的结果尚不清楚。
我们回顾性收集了2016年4月至2023年6月诊断为TCP并接受心包切除术的患者。根据结核分枝杆菌(MTB)培养和MTB RNA检测结果,将研究患者分为活动性TCP(A-TCP)组和非活动性TCP(IA-TCP)组。比较两组的基线特征,包括抗结核方案和手术结果。进行逻辑回归分析和亚组分析以确定A-TCP的保护因素。
102例研究患者中,A-TCP组24例,IA-TCP组78例。A-TCP组术前含吡嗪酰胺的抗结核方案使用率为37.5%,而IA-TCP组为74.4%(P = 0.001)。多因素分析显示,术前使用吡嗪酰胺是A-TCP的保护因素(OR 0.194,95%CI 0.053-0.703,P = 0.013)。基于年龄的亚组分析也显示了一致的结果。在手术结果分析中,A-TCP是术后心脏并发症的独立危险因素(OR 4.231,95%CI 1.317-13.593,P = 0.015),并与住院时间延长(P = 0.004)和住院费用增加(P = 0.001)相关。
对于TCP患者,心包切除术前行含吡嗪酰胺的抗结核方案优于不含吡嗪酰胺的方案。该方案与A-TCP风险较低相关,可能导致更好的术后恢复和成本效益。