Suppr超能文献

牙间乳头重建:系统评价。

Interdental papilla reconstruction: a systematic review.

机构信息

Periodontology Unit, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, Floor 18, Tower Wing, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, England, UK.

Periodontology Department Floor 25, Guy's Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital Great Maze Pond, London Bridge, London, SE1 9RT, England, UK.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 17;28(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05409-0.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess treatment options for the reconstruction of the lost interdental papilla and to evaluate evidence for their efficacy.

METHODS

An electronic search (Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library Database and OpenGray) and a hand search were carried out to identify all types of studies investigating interdental papilla reconstruction (except for reviews) with a minimum of 3 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included in the study including 7 RCTs, 2 cohort studies, 19 case series and 17 case reports. Fifteen studies reported on the use of hyaluronic acid, 6 studies on platelet-rich fibrin, 16 studies on soft tissue grafting, 4 studies on orthodontics and 4 on additional modalities. The most common outcome measures were black triangle dimensions and papillary fill percentage. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the high heterogeneity of the studies.

CONCLUSION

There are various options for interdental papilla reconstruction of which hyaluronic acid injections, PRF, surgical grafting and orthodontics seem to improve outcomes at a minimum 3 months. The use of soft tissue grafting with sub-epithelial connective tissue graft seems to be associated with the most robust evidence for the longer-term reduction of 'black triangles'. There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations to clinicians. Further research is needed in the form of well conducted RCTs with longer follow ups and patient reported outcome measures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patients frequently complain about the appearance of black triangles and their management options seem unclear. This systematic review provides insight into the available reconstructive options.

摘要

目的

评估重建缺失的龈乳头的治疗选择,并评估其疗效的证据。

方法

进行了电子检索(Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库和 OpenGray)和手工检索,以确定所有类型的研究,这些研究都调查了龈乳头重建(不包括综述),随访时间至少为 3 个月。

结果

45 项研究被纳入研究,包括 7 项 RCT、2 项队列研究、19 项病例系列和 17 项病例报告。15 项研究报告了透明质酸的使用,6 项研究报告了富含血小板的纤维蛋白,16 项研究报告了软组织移植,4 项研究报告了正畸,4 项研究报告了其他方式。最常见的结局测量指标是黑三角的尺寸和乳头填充百分比。由于研究的高度异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。

结论

有多种方法可以重建龈乳头,其中透明质酸注射、富血小板纤维蛋白、手术移植和正畸似乎可以在至少 3 个月的时间内改善结果。使用带上皮下结缔组织移植物的软组织移植似乎与长期减少“黑三角”的证据最有力。目前还没有足够的证据向临床医生提出建议。需要进一步研究,形式为进行更长时间随访和患者报告结局测量的良好 RCT。

临床相关性

患者经常抱怨黑三角的外观,他们的治疗选择似乎不清楚。本系统评价提供了对现有重建选择的深入了解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/428d/10794407/8d01b457ca0f/784_2023_5409_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验