School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, 7248, Australia.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Nov;78(11):963-969. doi: 10.1038/s41430-023-01394-5. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: An appreciation of infant body composition is helpful to understand the 'quality' of growth in early life. Air displacement plethysmography (ADP) using PEA POD and the deuterium dilution (DD) technique are commonly used body composition approaches in infants. We evaluated the comparability of body composition assessed using both techniques with two-compartment (2C) and three-compartment (3C) models in 6-month-old infants.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Infant fat mass (FM) and percent fat mass (%FM) obtained from a 2C model using PEA POD (2C-PP) and a 2C model using the deuterium dilution technique (2C-DD) were compared to those derived from a 3C model, and to each other, using Bland-Altman analysis and Deming regression.
Measurements were available from 68 infants (93% Caucasian, 53% male). The mean biases were not significant between any of the method comparisons. However, significant constant and proportional biases were identified in 2C-DD vs 3C and 2C-PP vs 2C-DD, but not in the 2C-PP vs 3C comparison. Furthermore, we observed significant associations between the mean differences and infants' percent total body water (%TBW).
While no significant between-method mean differences were found in body composition estimates, some comparisons revealed significant constant and proportional biases and notable associations between the mean differences and %TBW were observed. Our results emphasise the importance of method choice, ensuring methodological uniformity in long-term studies, and carefully considering and regulating multiple pre-analytical variables, such as the hydration status of the participants.
背景/目的:了解婴儿的身体成分有助于理解其生命早期的“生长质量”。空气置换体描记法(ADP)结合 PEA POD 和氘稀释(DD)技术是常用于婴儿身体成分评估的两种方法。我们评估了这两种方法在 6 月龄婴儿中使用双 compartment(2C)和三 compartment(3C)模型评估身体成分的可比性。
受试者/方法:使用 PEA POD(2C-PP)的 2C 模型和氘稀释技术(2C-DD)的 2C 模型获得的婴儿脂肪量(FM)和脂肪百分比(%FM)与 3C 模型进行了比较,并使用 Bland-Altman 分析和 Deming 回归对彼此进行了比较。
共有 68 名婴儿(93%为白种人,53%为男性)可用于测量。任何方法比较之间的平均偏差均无显著差异。然而,在 2C-DD 与 3C 和 2C-PP 与 2C-DD 之间发现了显著的恒定和比例偏差,但在 2C-PP 与 3C 之间没有发现。此外,我们观察到平均差异与婴儿总身体水分百分比(%TBW)之间存在显著关联。
尽管在身体成分估计方面未发现方法间的显著平均差异,但一些比较显示出显著的恒定和比例偏差,并且观察到平均差异与%TBW 之间存在显著关联。我们的结果强调了方法选择的重要性,确保在长期研究中方法的一致性,并仔细考虑和调节多个分析前变量,如参与者的水合状态。