Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Aug;35(8):1124-30. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2010.250. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
Air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) may be a valid and practical technique to assess body composition in a clinical setting.
This study aimed to assess longitudinal changes in body composition using ADP and to compare it with the deuterium dilution technique.
The study was a 6-months dietary intervention, consisting of four phases. The first month, subjects were fed in energy balance (phase I). This was followed by 1 month with an energy intake of 33% of energy requirements (phase II), followed by 2 months at 67% of energy requirements (phase III) and 2 months of ad libitum intake (phase IV). Body composition was assessed using ADP (Bod Pod) and deuterium dilution at baseline and at the end of each phase. The baseline analysis included 111 subjects (88 female). Sixty-one subjects (50 female) completed all measurements and were included in the longitudinal analysis.
At baseline, the fat mass (FM) as assessed with the Bod Pod was on average 2.3 ± 4.2 kg (mean ± 2 s.d.) higher than that assessed with deuterium dilution. The difference in FM between techniques increased significantly with increasing FM (R(2)=0.23; P<0.001). Both techniques showed significant changes in FM over time P<0.001). On average, FM as assessed with the Bod Pod was 2.0 kg higher than with deuterium dilution (P<0.001). During phase II, there was a significant interaction between time and method, meaning that the Bod Pod showed a larger decrease in FM than deuterium dilution.
The Bod Pod was able to detect all changes in the body composition, but consistently measured a higher FM than deuterium dilution.
空气置换体描记法(ADP)可能是一种在临床环境中评估身体成分的有效且实用的技术。
本研究旨在使用 ADP 评估身体成分的纵向变化,并将其与氘稀释技术进行比较。
该研究是一项为期 6 个月的饮食干预,包括四个阶段。第一个月,受试者的能量摄入处于平衡状态(第 I 期)。随后,能量摄入减少到能量需求的 33%(第 II 期),接着是 2 个月的 67%(第 III 期),最后是 2 个月的随意摄入(第 IV 期)。在基线和每个阶段结束时,使用 ADP(Bod Pod)和氘稀释法评估身体成分。基线分析包括 111 名受试者(88 名女性)。61 名受试者(50 名女性)完成了所有测量,并纳入了纵向分析。
在基线时,Bod Pod 评估的体脂肪量(FM)平均比氘稀释法高 2.3±4.2 公斤(平均值±2 个标准差)。两种技术之间的 FM 差异随着 FM 的增加而显著增加(R²=0.23;P<0.001)。两种技术的 FM 均随时间显著变化(P<0.001)。平均而言,Bod Pod 评估的 FM 比氘稀释法高 2.0 公斤(P<0.001)。在第 II 期,时间和方法之间存在显著的交互作用,这意味着 Bod Pod 显示出 FM 比氘稀释法更大的下降。
Bod Pod 能够检测到身体成分的所有变化,但始终测量到比氘稀释法更高的 FM。