School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Musculoskeletal Health and Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00925-4.
Musculoskeletal conditions are the most common health condition seen in emergency departments. Hence, the most effective approaches to managing these conditions is of interest. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of allied health and nursing models of care for the management of musculoskeletal pain in ED.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and LILACS databases were searched from inception to March 2023 for published randomised trials that compared the effectiveness of allied health and nursing models of care for musculoskeletal conditions in ED to usual ED care. Trials were eligible if they enrolled participants presenting to ED with a musculoskeletal condition including low back pain, neck pain, upper or lower limb pain and any soft tissue injury. Trials that included patients with serious pathology (e.g. malignancy, infection or cauda equina syndrome) were excluded. The primary outcome was patient-flow; other outcomes included pain intensity, disability, hospital admission and re-presentation rates, patient satisfaction, medication prescription and adverse events. Two reviewers performed search screening, data extraction, quality and certainty of evidence assessments.
We identified 1746 records and included 5 randomised trials (n = 1512 patients). Only one trial (n = 260) reported on patient-flow. The study provides very-low certainty evidence that a greater proportion of patients were seen within 20 min when seen by a physician (98%) than when seen by a nurse (86%) or physiotherapist (77%). There was no difference in pain intensity and disability between patients managed by ED physicians and those managed by physiotherapists. Evidence was limited regarding patient satisfaction, inpatient admission and ED re-presentation rates, medication prescription and adverse events. The certainty of evidence for secondary outcomes ranged from very-low to low, but generally did not suggest a benefit of one model over another.
There is limited research to judge the effectiveness of allied health and nursing models of care for the management of musculoskeletal conditions in ED. Currently, it is unclear as to whether allied health and nurse practitioners are more effective than ED physicians at managing musculoskeletal conditions in ED. Further high-quality trials investigating the impact of models of care on service and health outcomes are needed.
肌肉骨骼疾病是急诊科最常见的健康问题。因此,寻找最有效的治疗方法至关重要。本系统评价旨在评估急诊科中辅助医疗和护理模式在管理肌肉骨骼疼痛方面的有效性。
从建库至 2023 年 3 月,我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 LILACS 数据库,以获取比较急诊科中辅助医疗和护理模式与常规急诊科护理对肌肉骨骼疾病治疗效果的已发表随机试验。如果试验纳入了因肌肉骨骼疾病(如腰痛、颈痛、上下肢痛和任何软组织损伤)到急诊科就诊的参与者,则试验符合纳入标准。排除纳入严重病理患者(如恶性肿瘤、感染或马尾综合征)的试验。主要结局为患者流程;其他结局包括疼痛强度、残疾、住院和再就诊率、患者满意度、药物处方和不良事件。两名评审员进行了检索筛选、数据提取、质量和证据确定性评估。
我们共确定了 1746 条记录,并纳入了 5 项随机试验(n=1512 名患者)。仅有 1 项试验(n=260)报告了患者流程。该研究提供了非常低确定性证据,表明当由医生(98%)而不是护士(86%)或物理治疗师(77%)接诊时,有更多的患者能在 20 分钟内得到诊治。接受急诊科医生和物理治疗师管理的患者之间的疼痛强度和残疾程度没有差异。关于患者满意度、住院和急诊科再就诊率、药物处方和不良事件的数据有限。次要结局的证据确定性范围从非常低到低,但通常没有表明一种模式比另一种模式更有效。
目前,有关辅助医疗和护理模式在急诊科管理肌肉骨骼疾病的有效性的研究有限。目前尚不清楚辅助医疗和护士从业者在管理急诊科肌肉骨骼疾病方面是否比急诊科医生更有效。需要进一步开展高质量的临床试验,以调查护理模式对服务和健康结局的影响。