Farokhzadian Jamileh, Eskici Gulcan Taskiran, Molavi-Taleghani Yasamin, Tavan Asghar, Farahmandnia Hojjat
Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Department of Nursing Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jan 17;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01708-3.
Patient safety is one of the critical indicators of providing qualified and high-quality health care services. Determining nursing students' patient safety competencies will significantly contribute to the literature. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate Iranian nursing students' patient safety competencies in classroom and clinical settings.
In this cross-sectional study data were collected from 215 nursing of a university of medical sciences between February and May 2022, using a general questionnaire form and the Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey. Data analysis was done using descriptive and analytical statistics such as percentage, mean and paired-samples t-test.
The mean scores of nursing students' the Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey were 3.50 ± 0.55 in the classroom and 3.45 ± 0.57 in the clinical setting. The highest mean scores of nursing students were in subdimension of "clinical safety" in both the clinical (3.91 ± 1.13) and classroom settings (3.91 ± 0.78). In addition, a statistically significant difference was found in patient safety learning confidence in the classroom versus clinical setting in the "culture of safety" subdimension.
It appears that current educational programs provide opportunities to improve nursing students' patient safety, but they are not enough. Nurse educators should apply new teaching methods and evaluate clinical strategies to meet educational needs.
患者安全是提供合格且高质量医疗服务的关键指标之一。确定护生的患者安全能力将对相关文献做出重大贡献。因此,本研究旨在调查伊朗护生在课堂和临床环境中的患者安全能力。
在这项横断面研究中,于2022年2月至5月期间,使用通用问卷形式和患者安全调查中的卫生专业教育问卷,从一所医科大学的215名护生中收集数据。数据分析采用描述性和分析性统计方法,如百分比、均值和配对样本t检验。
护生在患者安全调查中的卫生专业教育平均得分,课堂环境下为3.50±0.55,临床环境下为3.45±0.57。护生在临床(3.91±1.13)和课堂环境(3.91±0.78)中,得分最高的均为“临床安全”子维度。此外,在“安全文化”子维度中,课堂环境与临床环境下的患者安全学习信心存在统计学上的显著差异。
目前的教育项目似乎为提高护生的患者安全提供了机会,但还不够。护理教育工作者应采用新的教学方法并评估临床策略,以满足教育需求。