• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施患者和家属参与干预措施以促进患者安全:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Implementing Patient and Family Involvement Interventions for Promoting Patient Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

From the College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2021 Mar 1;17(2):131-140. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000714.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000714
PMID:33208637
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the study were to evaluate and to quantify the effects of patient and family involvement (PFI) interventions on patient safety by synthesizing the available global data.

METHODS

Four databases were searched to identify relevant studies that have assessed the impact of PFI on patient safety up to March 2019. Reference lists of potential selected articles were also used to identify additional relevant studies. Effect sizes (ESs) were calculated using random and fixed effects models. Statistical heterogeneity was measured using the I2 test.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the review criteria. The meta-analysis showed that PFI were beneficial in significantly reducing adverse events (ES = -0.240, P < 0.001), decreasing the length of hospital stay (ES = -0.122, P < 0.001), increasing patient safety experiences (ES = 0.630, P = 0.007), and improving patient satisfaction (ES = 0.268, P = 0.004). However, the PFI interventions did not significantly enhance the perception of patient safety (ES = 0.205, P = 0.09) or the quality of life (ES = 0.057, P = 0.61). Moreover, moderate-to-high heterogeneity was found for all impacts except adverse events (I2 = 0%) and length of hospital stay (I2 = 35%). A funnel plot indicated a low degree of publication bias for the adverse event outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The synthesized evidence in this review demonstrates the benefits of PFI for promoting patient safety. However, further studies should extend the research scope to fill the existing gaps for both the type of PFI interventions and the patient safety outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过综合现有全球数据,评估和量化患者和家属参与(PFI)干预对患者安全的影响。

方法

检索了四个数据库,以确定截至 2019 年 3 月评估 PFI 对患者安全影响的相关研究。还使用潜在选定文章的参考文献列表来确定其他相关研究。使用随机和固定效应模型计算效应大小(ES)。使用 I2 检验测量统计异质性。

结果

符合审查标准的有 22 项研究。荟萃分析表明,PFI 显著有利于减少不良事件(ES = -0.240,P < 0.001),缩短住院时间(ES = -0.122,P < 0.001),增加患者安全体验(ES = 0.630,P = 0.007),提高患者满意度(ES = 0.268,P = 0.004)。然而,PFI 干预并没有显著提高患者对安全的感知(ES = 0.205,P = 0.09)或生活质量(ES = 0.057,P = 0.61)。此外,除不良事件(I2 = 0%)和住院时间(I2 = 35%)外,所有结果均存在中高度异质性。漏斗图表明不良事件结果的发表偏倚程度较低。

结论

本综述综合证据表明,PFI 有助于促进患者安全。然而,进一步的研究应扩大研究范围,以填补 PFI 干预类型和患者安全结果方面的现有空白。

相似文献

1
Implementing Patient and Family Involvement Interventions for Promoting Patient Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.实施患者和家属参与干预措施以促进患者安全:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Mar 1;17(2):131-140. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000714.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
4
Does retirement trigger depressive symptoms? A systematic review and meta-analysis.退休是否会引发抑郁症状?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 Dec 1;30:e77. doi: 10.1017/S2045796021000627.
5
Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴发抑郁症的药物干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 19;12(12):CD012346. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012346.pub2.
6
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房促进睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 6;2015(10):CD008808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008808.pub2.
7
8
The impact of Tai Chi and Qigong mind-body exercises on motor and non-motor function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.太极拳和气功身心锻炼对帕金森病运动和非运动功能及生活质量的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017 Aug;41:3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 25.
9
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
10
Health outcomes associated with vegetarian diets: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.素食饮食与健康结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞式综述。
Clin Nutr. 2020 Nov;39(11):3283-3307. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.02.037. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and Family-Centered Care to Promote Inpatient Safety: An Exploration of Nursing Care and Management Processes.以患者和家庭为中心的护理以促进住院安全:护理与管理流程探索
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jul 16;15(7):260. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15070260.
2
Learning from the implementation of person-centred care: a meta-synthesis of research related to the Gothenburg framework.从以人为本的护理实施中学习:对与哥德堡框架相关研究的元综合分析
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 1;5:1589502. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1589502. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluating SinergiAPS, an intervention based on patient feedback to improve patient safety in primary care: a cluster randomized trial.
评估基于患者反馈的干预措施SinergiAPS以改善初级保健中的患者安全:一项整群随机试验。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04029-7.
4
Barriers and Facilitators of Patient Engagement Activities to Improve Patient Safety in Healthcare Organizations: A Delphi-Based Expert Survey.医疗机构中促进患者参与活动以提高患者安全的障碍与促进因素:一项基于德尔菲法的专家调查
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Dec 19;17:3217-3226. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S489522. eCollection 2024.
5
Patient and public involvement in healthcare: a systematic mapping review of systematic reviews - identification of current research and possible directions for future research.患者和公众参与医疗保健:系统评价的系统综述-当前研究的识别和未来研究的可能方向。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 19;14(9):e083215. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083215.
6
Motivation for patient engagement in patient safety: a multi-perspective, explorative survey.患者参与患者安全的动机:多视角、探索性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):1052. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11495-x.
7
The impact of patient engagement on patient safety in care transitions after cancer treatment: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.患者参与对癌症治疗后护理交接中患者安全的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 27;19(8):e0307831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307831. eCollection 2024.
8
Feasibility and acceptability of implementing an evidence-based ESCALATION system for paediatric clinical deterioration.实施基于证据的儿科临床病情恶化升级系统的可行性和可接受性。
Pediatr Res. 2025 Feb;97(3):1047-1057. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03459-y. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
9
Patient and family engagement in patient safety in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a scoping review.患者和家属参与东地中海地区患者安全:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11198-3.
10
Evaluation of SINERGIAPS, an intervention to improve patient safety in primary healthcare centers in Spain based on patients' perceptions and experiences: a protocol for a hybrid type I randomized clinical trial.评价 SINERGIAPS,一项基于患者感知和体验的改善西班牙初级保健中心患者安全的干预措施:一项混合类型 I 随机临床试验方案。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 26;12:1324940. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1324940. eCollection 2024.