Yusupova Anna, Shved Dmitry, Gushin Vadim, Chekalina Angelina, Supolkina Natalia
State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation-Institute of Biomedical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Front Neuroergon. 2021 Nov 12;2:768386. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2021.768386. eCollection 2021.
In "Content," an International Space Station (ISS) Russian segment space experiment, features of communication between the cosmonauts and the Mission Control Center (MCC) were studied using content analysis. The method is based on the concept of stress copings by Lazarus and Folkman. Differences found in the communication of cosmonauts led to assumptions about the existence of individual communication styles in routine communication between the cosmonauts and the MCC. The differences found were defined using V. Satir's classical model of communication types. The pre-dominance of three main communication styles ("computing," "blaming," and "placating," as per Satir) was found. Manifestations and features of styles are discussed, considering the effectiveness of the "computing" style for ISS-MCC communication. Cosmonauts with a pre-dominance of this communication style, mostly are stable and with good self-control. An increase of the "blaming" and the "placating" style features in the communication of cosmonauts may require adaptation of the MCC communication and additional psychological support for the cosmonauts.
在一项名为“内容”的国际空间站(ISS)俄罗斯舱段空间实验中,运用内容分析法对宇航员与任务控制中心(MCC)之间的通信特点进行了研究。该方法基于拉扎勒斯和福克曼提出的压力应对概念。在宇航员通信中发现的差异引发了关于宇航员与任务控制中心日常通信中存在个体通信风格的假设。所发现的差异是根据萨蒂尔经典的通信类型模型来界定的。研究发现三种主要通信风格(按照萨蒂尔的说法,即“算计型”、“指责型”和“讨好型”)占主导地位。文中讨论了这些风格的表现形式和特点,并考虑了“算计型”风格对国际空间站与任务控制中心通信的有效性。以这种通信风格为主的宇航员大多情绪稳定且自控能力良好。宇航员通信中“指责型”和“讨好型”风格特点的增加可能需要任务控制中心调整通信方式,并为宇航员提供额外的心理支持。