Li Jun
Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Apr;81(2):122-132. doi: 10.1177/10775587231221852. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
Health care report cards improve information and are a crucial part of health care reform of the federal government of the United States. I exploit a natural experiment in the home health sector to assess whether a higher rating under the star ratings program affects patient choice. Higher rated agencies increased their market share by 1.4% or 0.25 (95% confidence interval: [-0.63, 1.12]) percentage points, a practically and statistically insignificant amount. I find no evidence of heterogeneous effects across the rating distribution or over time. I also find precise null effects among consumers expected to be more responsive, including community-entry patients and patients in competitive markets with more options and star types. Agencies may have modestly impeded consumer choice by engaging in some patient selection behaviors, although the evidence is only weakly suggestive. The star ratings are unlikely to improve home health quality despite continued policymaker interest.
医疗保健报告卡能改善信息,是美国联邦政府医疗保健改革的关键部分。我利用家庭健康领域的一项自然实验来评估星级评定计划下更高的评级是否会影响患者的选择。评级较高的机构将其市场份额提高了1.4%或0.25个百分点(95%置信区间:[-0.63, 1.12]),这在实际和统计上都是微不足道的。我没有发现评级分布或随时间变化存在异质性影响的证据。我还发现在预期更具响应性的消费者中,包括社区入院患者以及在有更多选择和星级类型的竞争市场中的患者,没有显著影响。尽管证据只是微弱暗示,但机构可能通过一些患者选择行为适度阻碍了消费者选择。尽管政策制定者持续关注,但星级评定不太可能提高家庭健康质量。