Chow Weng K, Cooper Robert D, Lokhorst Matthew, Zalucki Myron P, Ambrose Luke, Beebe Nigel W
Australian Defence Force Malaria and Infectious Disease Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia.
School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
J Med Entomol. 2024 Mar 13;61(2):491-497. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjad156.
During preliminary mosquito surveys at Cowley Beach Training Area in north Queensland, Australia, it was found that the utility of the standard encephalitis virus surveillance (EVS) trap for collecting the malaria vector Anopheles farauti (Laveran) adults was compromised by the harsh tropical conditions. With the aim of increasing the survival rate of mosquitoes, we designed a downdraft fan box trap (FBT) that incorporated a screened fan at the bottom of the trap, so mosquitoes did not have to pass through a fan. The FBT was tested against the EVS and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) light traps, where mosquitoes do pass through a fan, and a nonpowered passive box trap (PBT). We conducted 4 trials to compare the quantity and survival of An. farauti and culicine mosquitoes were collected in these traps. Although not significant, the FBT collected more An. farauti than the EVS trap and PBT and significantly less An. farauti than the CDC light trap. However, the FBT improved on the CDC light trap in terms of the survival of An. farauti adults collected, with a significantly higher percentage alive in the FBT (74.6%) than in the CDC light trap (27.5%). Thus, although the FBT did not collect as many anophelines as the CDC, it proved to be superior to current trap systems for collecting large numbers of live and relatively undamaged mosquitoes. Therefore, it is recommended that FBTs be used for collecting An. farauti adults in northern Australia, especially when high survival and sample quality are important.
在澳大利亚昆士兰州北部考利海滩训练区进行的初步蚊虫调查中,发现标准脑炎病毒监测(EVS)诱捕器在收集疟疾病媒——费氏按蚊(拉韦朗)成虫时,会受到恶劣热带条件的影响。为了提高蚊子的存活率,我们设计了一种向下通风扇箱诱捕器(FBT),该诱捕器在底部装有一个带纱窗的风扇,这样蚊子就不必穿过风扇。将FBT与EVS诱捕器、疾病控制中心(CDC)的灯光诱捕器(蚊子需要穿过风扇)以及无动力被动箱式诱捕器(PBT)进行了测试比较。我们进行了4次试验,以比较这些诱捕器中费氏按蚊和库蚊的捕获数量及存活率。虽然差异不显著,但FBT捕获的费氏按蚊比EVS诱捕器和PBT更多,而比CDC灯光诱捕器显著更少。然而,就捕获的费氏按蚊成虫的存活率而言,FBT优于CDC灯光诱捕器,FBT中存活的成虫百分比(74.6%)显著高于CDC灯光诱捕器(27.5%)。因此,尽管FBT捕获的按蚊数量不如CDC灯光诱捕器多,但事实证明,在收集大量存活且相对未受损的蚊子方面,它优于目前的诱捕系统。所以,建议在澳大利亚北部使用FBT来收集费氏按蚊成虫,尤其是在高存活率和样本质量很重要的情况下。