Environmental Health and Ecological Sciences Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Aug 27;12(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3673-7.
Improved surveillance techniques are required to accelerate efforts against major arthropod-borne diseases such as malaria, dengue, filariasis, Zika and yellow-fever. Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are increasingly used in mosquito traps because they improve energy efficiency and battery longevity relative to incandescent bulbs. This study evaluated the efficacy of a new ultraviolet LED trap (Mosclean) against standard mosquito collection methods.
The study was conducted in controlled semi-field settings and in field conditions in rural south-eastern Tanzania. The Mosclean trap was compared to commonly used techniques, namely CDC-light traps, human landing catches (HLCs), BG-Sentinel traps and Suna traps.
When simultaneously placed inside the same semi-field chamber, the Mosclean trap caught twice as many Anopheles arabiensis as the CDC-light trap, and equal numbers to HLCs. Similar results were obtained when traps were tested individually in the chambers. Under field settings, Mosclean traps caught equal numbers of An. arabiensis and twice as many Culex mosquitoes as CDC-light traps. It was also better at trapping malaria vectors compared to both Suna and BG-Sentinel traps, and was more efficient in collecting mosquitoes indoors than outdoors. The majority of An. arabiensis females caught by Mosclean traps were parous (63.6%) and inseminated (89.8%). In comparison, the females caught by CDC-light traps were 43.9% parous and 92.8% inseminated.
The UV LED trap (Mosclean trap) was efficacious for sampling Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes. Its efficacy was comparable to and in some instances better than traps commonly used for vector surveillance. The Mosclean trap was more productive in sampling mosquitoes indoors compared to outdoors. The trap can be used indoors near human-occupied nets, or outdoors, in which case additional CO improves catches. We conclude that this trap may have potential for mosquito surveillance. However, we recommend additional field tests to validate these findings in multiple settings and to assess the potential of LEDs to attract non-target organisms, especially outdoors.
为了加速对抗主要节肢动物传播疾病(如疟疾、登革热、丝虫病、寨卡病毒和黄热病)的努力,需要改进监测技术。发光二极管(LED)越来越多地用于诱蚊器,因为与白炽灯泡相比,它们可以提高能源效率和电池寿命。本研究评估了一种新型紫外 LED 诱蚊器(Mosclean)相对于标准蚊类收集方法的效果。
该研究在控制的半野外环境中和坦桑尼亚东南部农村的野外条件下进行。将 Mosclean 诱蚊器与常用技术(即 CDC 诱蚊灯、人诱捕器、BG-Sentinel 诱蚊器和 Suna 诱蚊器)进行了比较。
当同时放置在同一个半野外室内时,Mosclean 诱蚊器捕获的阿拉伯按蚊数量是 CDC 诱蚊灯的两倍,与人类诱捕器捕获的数量相同。在室内单独测试诱蚊器时,也得到了类似的结果。在野外环境下,Mosclean 诱蚊器捕获的阿拉伯按蚊和库蚊数量与 CDC 诱蚊灯相同,但它对捕获疟疾传播媒介的效果优于 Suna 和 BG-Sentinel 诱蚊器,且在室内捕获的蚊子比室外多。Mosclean 诱蚊器捕获的大多数阿拉伯按蚊雌蚊都是已孕(63.6%)和受精(89.8%)的。相比之下,CDC 诱蚊灯捕获的雌蚊中,已孕的占 43.9%,受精的占 92.8%。
紫外 LED 诱蚊器(Mosclean 诱蚊器)对采集按蚊和库蚊有效。其效果与常用的媒介监测诱蚊器相当,在某些情况下甚至更好。与室外相比,该诱蚊器在室内采集蚊子的效率更高。该诱蚊器可以在室内靠近有人居住的蚊帐处使用,也可以在室外使用,此时增加 CO 可以提高捕获率。我们得出结论,这种诱蚊器可能具有监测蚊子的潜力。然而,我们建议进行更多的野外测试,以在多种环境下验证这些发现,并评估 LED 吸引非目标生物的潜力,特别是在室外。