Institute of Medical Sociology, Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Institute of Medical Sociology, Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):e076602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076602.
Abortion is a crucial sexual and reproductive right. However, the legal situation of pregnancy termination is rather heterogeneous across countries and regions. The political climate and cultural perception may result in abortion-related stigma. This mixed-methods systematic review protocol aims to detail the proposed methods for assessing the current state of research on abortion stigma in high-income countries from an abortion seeker, healthcare provider and public perspective.
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guideline, we conducted a systematic literature search of peer-reviewed studies from high-income countries in relevant electronic databases: PubMed, CINHAL, PsycINFO, LIVIVO and Cochrane Library. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method studies that measured or examined abortion-related stigma in abortion seekers, healthcare professionals and the general public will be included. Assessment of risk of bias, data synthesis and qualitative meta-aggregation will be carried out.
The results of the systematic review will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.
堕胎是一项至关重要的性权利和生殖权利。然而,各国和各地区终止妊娠的法律状况存在相当大的差异。政治氛围和文化观念可能导致堕胎相关的耻辱感。本混合方法系统评价方案旨在详细说明从堕胎寻求者、医疗保健提供者和公众角度评估高收入国家堕胎耻辱感现状的拟议方法。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选报告项目准则,我们在相关电子数据库中对高收入国家的同行评议研究进行了系统文献检索:PubMed、CINHAL、PsycINFO、LIVIVO 和 Cochrane Library。将纳入衡量或检查堕胎寻求者、医疗保健专业人员和公众中与堕胎相关的耻辱感的定性、定量和混合方法研究。将进行偏倚风险评估、数据综合和定性荟萃分析。
系统评价的结果将提交给同行评议期刊,并在相关会议上发表。