Signorelli Marcos Claudio, Hillel Stav, de Oliveira Daniel Canavese, Ayala Quintanilla Beatriz Paulina, Hegarty Kelsey, Taft Angela
Department of Collective Health, Universidade Federal do Parana, Matinhos, Brazil.
Department of Library, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 25;8(3):e019266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019266.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) considerably harms the health, safety and well-being of women. In response, public health systems around the globe have been gradually implementing strategies. In particular, low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC) have been developing innovative interventions in primary healthcare (PHC) addressing the problem. This paper describes a protocol for a systematic review of studies addressing the impacts and outcomes of PHC centre interventions addressing IPV against women from LMIC.
A systematic search for studies will be conducted in African Index Medicus, Africa Portal Digital Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Index Medicus for the Southeast Asia Region, IndMed, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Literature Database (LILACS), Medecins Sans Frontieres, MEDLINE, Minority Health and Health Equity Archive, ProQuest, PsycINFO, Scientific Electronic Library Online, (SciELO) and Social Policy and Practice. Studies will be in English, Spanish and Portuguese, published between 2007 and 2017, addressing IPV against women from LMIC, whose data quantitatively report on the impacts and outcomes for survivors and/or workers and/or public health systems preintervention and postintervention. Two trilingual reviewers will independently screen for study eligibility and data extraction, and a librarian will cross-check for compliance. Risk of bias and quality assessment of studies will be measured according to: (1) the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias for randomised controlled trials and (2) the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS). Data will be analysed and summarised using meta-analysis and narrative description of the evidence across studies. This systematic review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols(PRISMA P) guidelines.
This systematic review will be based on published studies, thus not requiring ethical approval. Findings will be presented in conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.
CRD42017069261.
亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）对女性的健康、安全和幸福造成了极大伤害。作为回应，全球公共卫生系统一直在逐步实施相关策略。特别是低收入和中等收入国家（LMIC）一直在初级卫生保健（PHC）领域开发创新干预措施来解决这一问题。本文描述了一项系统评价的方案，该评价针对来自LMIC的解决针对妇女的IPV问题的初级卫生保健中心干预措施的影响和结果的研究。
将在《非洲医学索引》、非洲数字图书馆门户、护理及相关健康文献累积索引（CINAHL）、Embase、东南亚地区医学索引、印度医学、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献数据库（LILACS）、无国界医生组织、MEDLINE、少数族裔健康与健康公平档案、ProQuest、PsycINFO、科学电子图书馆在线（SciELO）以及社会政策与实践等数据库中系统检索相关研究。研究语言为英语、西班牙语和葡萄牙语，发表时间为2007年至2017年，涉及针对来自LMIC的妇女的IPV问题，其数据对干预前和干预后幸存者和/或工作人员和/或公共卫生系统的影响和结果进行定量报告。两名三语评审员将独立筛选研究的合格性并进行数据提取，一名图书馆员将进行交叉核对以确保合规。研究的偏倚风险和质量评估将根据：（1）Cochrane协作网评估随机对照试验偏倚风险的工具，以及（2）非随机研究方法学指数（MINORS）进行衡量。将使用荟萃分析和对各项研究证据的叙述性描述对数据进行分析和总结。本系统评价将按照系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目（PRISMA P）指南进行报告。
本系统评价将基于已发表的研究，因此无需伦理批准。研究结果将在会议上展示并发表在同行评审期刊上。
PROSPERO注册号：CRD42017069261。
