Collini Valentino, De Martino Maria, Andreis Alessandro, De Biasio Marzia, Gaspard Francesca, Paneva Elena, Tomat Mariacristina, Deferrari Gaetano Maria, Isola Miriam, Imazio Massimo
Cardiothoracic Department, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
University of Udine, Udine, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy.
Heart. 2024 Apr 25;110(10):735-739. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323484.
Clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of colchicine only in simple pericarditis, excluding cases of concomitant myocarditis. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of colchicine for the treatment of the first attack of acute pericarditis with concomitant myocardial involvement.
Double-centre retrospective cohort study analysing consecutive patients admitted for first attack of pericarditis with myocarditis and treated with or without colchicine. The primary efficacy end point was the time to the first recurrence. Propensity score matching was used to generate two groups of patients with similar baseline characteristics. Colchicine-associated side effects were analysed as safety end-point.
A total of 175 patients (mean age 46.2±20.1 years, 25.1% females, 88.6% with idiopathic/viral aetiology) were included. Seventy-nine (45.1%) patients were treated with colchicine. After a median follow-up of 25.3 (IQR 8.3-45.6) months, 58 (33.1%) patients had recurrences. The propensity score generated two groups of 73 patients with similar baseline characteristics but the use of colchicine. Patients treated with colchicine had a lower incidence of recurrences (respectively, 19.2% vs 43.8%; p=0.001) and a longer event-free survival (p=0.005). In multivariable analysis, women (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.73; p=0.037) and corticosteroid use (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.47; p=0.018) were independent risk factors for recurrences. Colchicine-associated side effects were mild and occurred in 3 (1.7%) patients.
In patients with first attack of pericarditis associated with myocardial involvement, colchicine was safe and efficacious for the reduction of recurrences.
临床试验仅评估了秋水仙碱在单纯心包炎中的疗效和安全性,未纳入合并心肌炎的病例。本文旨在评估秋水仙碱治疗合并心肌受累的急性心包炎首次发作的疗效和安全性。
双中心回顾性队列研究,分析因心包炎合并心肌炎首次发作入院并接受或未接受秋水仙碱治疗的连续患者。主要疗效终点是首次复发时间。采用倾向评分匹配法生成两组基线特征相似的患者。将秋水仙碱相关的副作用作为安全性终点进行分析。
共纳入175例患者(平均年龄46.2±20.1岁,女性占25.1%,88.6%病因是特发性/病毒性)。79例(45.1%)患者接受了秋水仙碱治疗。中位随访25.3(四分位间距8.3 - 45.6)个月后,58例(33.1%)患者复发。倾向评分生成了两组各73例基线特征相似但使用秋水仙碱情况不同的患者。接受秋水仙碱治疗的患者复发率较低(分别为19.2%对43.8%;p = 0.001),无事件生存期更长(p = 0.005)。多变量分析中,女性(风险比1.97,95%置信区间1.04至3.73;p = 0.037)和使用皮质类固醇(风险比2.27,95%置信区间1.15至4.47;p = 0.018)是复发的独立危险因素。秋水仙碱相关副作用轻微,3例(1.7%)患者出现。
在合并心肌受累的心包炎首次发作患者中,秋水仙碱对减少复发安全有效。